R. v. McCarthy (M.), (1995) 91 O.A.C. 348 (CA)

JudgeFinlayson, Carthy and Labrosse, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Case DateJune 26, 1995
JurisdictionOntario
Citations(1995), 91 O.A.C. 348 (CA)

R. v. McCarthy (M.) (1995), 91 O.A.C. 348 (CA)

MLB headnote and full text

Her Majesty The Queen (respondent) v. Michael McCarthy (applicant/appellant)

(C18707)

Indexed As: R. v. McCarthy (M.)

Ontario Court of Appeal

Finlayson, Carthy and Labrosse, JJ.A.

July 5, 1995.

Summary:

The accused was convicted of numerous weapons charges. He appealed the convic­tions.

The Ontario Court of Appeal, Carthy, J.A., dissenting, dismissed the appeal.

Criminal Law - Topic 4300

Procedure - Trial judge - Duties and functions of - Respecting credibility of witnesses - The accused was convicted of weapons offences - At the voir dire he alleged that police abuse rendered a search of his apartment unreasonable - An officer testified that he did not see the accused struck in the head - The accused was not cross-examined regarding abuse - Defence counsel did not cross-examine the officer but argued that all allegations except re­specting the blows to the head stood un­contradicted - The trial judge commented that he was not prepared at that time to make a finding of credibility and that the matter could be dealt with more specifi­cally during trial - The issue did not come up again - The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed the convictions, holding that the trial judge was in the best position to assess the evidence and he was entitled to reject the accused's evidence.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Debot, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1140; 102 N.R. 161; 37 O.A.C. 1; 52 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 73 C.R.(3d) 129; 45 C.R.R. 49, refd to. [para. 2].

R. v. Verney (M.) (1993), 67 O.A.C. 279; 87 C.C.C.(3d) 363 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].

R. v. Burns (R.H.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656; 165 N.R. 374; 42 B.C.A.C. 161; 67 W.A.C. 161; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 29 C.R.(4th) 113, refd to. [para. 6].

R. v. Barrett (D.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 752; 179 N.R. 68; 80 O.A.C. 1; 96 C.C.C.(3d) 319, refd to. [para. 6].

R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; 90 N.R. 273; 46 C.C.C.(3d) 479; 67 C.R.(3d) 87; 56 D.L.R.(4th) 673, refd to. [para. 7].

Statutes Noticed:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 8 [para. 2].

Counsel:

Frank R. Addario, for the appellant;

Gary T. Trotter, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard on June 26, 1995, before Finlayson, Carthy and Labrosse, JJ.A., of the Ontario Court of Appeal. An endorsement was released by the court on July 5, 1995, including the following opin­ions:

Finlayson and Labrosse, JJ.A. - see paragraphs 1 to 8;

Carthy, J.A., dissenting - see paragraphs 9 to 18.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2021
    ...[1995] 3 S.C.R. 562, R. v. Spackman, 2012 ONCA 905, R. v. Darwish, 2010 ONCA 124, R. v. La, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 680, R. v. McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev'd [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, R. v. Egger, [1993] 2......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2021
    ...[1995] 3 S.C.R. 562, R. v. Spackman, 2012 ONCA 905, R. v. Darwish, 2010 ONCA 124, R. v. La, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 680, R. v. McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev'd [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, R. v. Egger, [1993] 2......
  • Ontario (Labour) v. Miller Group Inc., 2021 ONCA 879
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 10, 2021
    ...police officers, and between the police and the accused person. Failing to do so may amount to a fatal error. In R. v. McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev’d [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, a new trial was ordered because the trial judge failed to resolve credibility issues on a s. 8 Char......
  • R. v. Musselman (G.), [1999] O.T.C. 68 (SupCt)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 17, 1999
    ...1 to 21. Cases Noticed: R. v. D.W., [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742; 122 N.R. 277; 46 O.A.C. 352, refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. McCarthy (M.) (1995), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), revsd. [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460; 198 N.R. 393; 92 O.A.C. 199, refd to. [para. R. v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; 194 N.R. 321; 73 B.C.A.C. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Ontario (Labour) v. Miller Group Inc., 2021 ONCA 879
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 10, 2021
    ...police officers, and between the police and the accused person. Failing to do so may amount to a fatal error. In R. v. McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev’d [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, a new trial was ordered because the trial judge failed to resolve credibility issues on a s. 8 Char......
  • R. v. Musselman (G.), [1999] O.T.C. 68 (SupCt)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 17, 1999
    ...1 to 21. Cases Noticed: R. v. D.W., [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742; 122 N.R. 277; 46 O.A.C. 352, refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. McCarthy (M.) (1995), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), revsd. [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460; 198 N.R. 393; 92 O.A.C. 199, refd to. [para. R. v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; 194 N.R. 321; 73 B.C.A.C. ......
  • R. v. Cole (A.), [2006] O.T.C. 341 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 10, 2006
    ...of Scientology of Toronto and Zaharia (1987), 18 O.A.C. 321; 31 C.C.C.(3d) 449 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. McCarthy (M.) (1995), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), revd. [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460; 198 N.R. 393; 92 O.A.C. 199, refd to. [para. 22, footnote 3]. Southam Inc. v. Hunter, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145;......
  • R. v. Pammett, [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1242 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 26, 2014
    ...date on the warrant was a mere oversight. Moreover, the Crown submits that the comments of the Court of Appeal in R. v. McCarthy (1995), 91 O.A.C. 348, wherein the panel agreed with the appellant's concession that the absence of the date on which the warrant could be executed was only a tec......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2021
    ...[1995] 3 S.C.R. 562, R. v. Spackman, 2012 ONCA 905, R. v. Darwish, 2010 ONCA 124, R. v. La, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 680, R. v. McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev'd [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, R. v. Egger, [1993] 2......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2021
    ...[1995] 3 S.C.R. 562, R. v. Spackman, 2012 ONCA 905, R. v. Darwish, 2010 ONCA 124, R. v. La, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 680, R. v. McCarthy (1996), 91 O.A.C. 348 (C.A.), rev'd [1996] 2 S.C.R. 460, R. v. Jageshur (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 225 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Dallas, 2002 BCSC 760, R. v. Egger, [1993] 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT