R. v. McColman

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle
Citation2023 SCC 8
Date23 March 2023
Docket Number39826

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
89 practice notes
  • R. v. Zacharias
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 1, 2023
    ...69 , [2018] 12 W.W.R. 280 ; R. v. Reilly, 2021 SCC 38 ; R. v. Au‑Yeung, 2010 ONSC 2292 , 209 C.R.R. (2d) 140 ; R. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8; R. v. Vu, 2013 SCC 60 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 657 ; R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220 ; R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50 , [2013] 3......
  • R. v. Archambault
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 1, 2024
    ...2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653; R. v. Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26; R. v. D.A.I., 2012 SCC 5, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 149; R. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8; Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23; MediaQMI inc. v. Kamel, 2021 SCC 23, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 899; Sun Indalex Finance, LLC v. Unit......
  • R v Wright
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 21, 2025
    ...(see, for example: Dedman v The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 2; R v Hufsky, [1988] 1 SCR 621; R v Ladouceur, [1990] 1 SCR 1257; and R v McColman, 2023 SCC 8 at para 29). In my respectful view, nothing about s. 320.27(2) provides a reason to revisit any of this jurisprudence. Police officers may reso......
  • R. v. Campbell
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 6, 2024
    ...34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432; R. v. Marakah, 2016 ONCA 542, 131 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8; R. v. Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 579; R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. Statutes and Regul......
  • Get Started for Free
82 cases
  • R. v. Zacharias
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 1, 2023
    ...69 , [2018] 12 W.W.R. 280 ; R. v. Reilly, 2021 SCC 38 ; R. v. Au‑Yeung, 2010 ONSC 2292 , 209 C.R.R. (2d) 140 ; R. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8; R. v. Vu, 2013 SCC 60 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 657 ; R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220 ; R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50 , [2013] 3......
  • R. v. Archambault
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 1, 2024
    ...2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653; R. v. Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26; R. v. D.A.I., 2012 SCC 5, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 149; R. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8; Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23; MediaQMI inc. v. Kamel, 2021 SCC 23, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 899; Sun Indalex Finance, LLC v. Unit......
  • R v Wright
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 21, 2025
    ...(see, for example: Dedman v The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 2; R v Hufsky, [1988] 1 SCR 621; R v Ladouceur, [1990] 1 SCR 1257; and R v McColman, 2023 SCC 8 at para 29). In my respectful view, nothing about s. 320.27(2) provides a reason to revisit any of this jurisprudence. Police officers may reso......
  • R. v. Campbell
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 6, 2024
    ...34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432; R. v. Marakah, 2016 ONCA 542, 131 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8; R. v. Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 579; R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. Statutes and Regul......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 11 ' 15, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 19, 2025
    ...c. B-3, Entertainment Software Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 34, R. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8, Canada Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Canadian Commercial Bank, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 558, Re Nelson Financial Group Ltd., 2010 ONSC 6229, Re U.S. Steel......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 10 ' 14, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 20, 2025
    ...6) (1987), 31 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54, R. v. McGregor, 2023 SCC 4, R. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8, R. v. Zacharias, 2023 SCC 30, P. (D.) v. Wagg, 71 O.R. (3d) 229 (C.A.), RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd., [1986] 2 S.C.R. 573, Hill v. Church......
  • Impaired Driving ' Recent Decisions From The Supreme Court Of Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 12, 2023
    ...practice impaired driving and 80 plus law, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) recently rendered two decisions of interest. 1. v. McColman, 2023 SCC 8 On March 23, 2023 they decided an appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, which dealt with whether a sobriety test under section 48 of th......
4 books & journal articles
  • Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...Beaver ], where an issue on appeal was “whether the police had reasonable and probable grounds to arrest the appellants”; or R v McColman , 2023 SCC 8 at para 4 [ McColman ]: “the police oicers did not have reasonable and probable grounds to stop him.” 387 See, for example, Kang-Brown , abo......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...269 McCarthy , R v , [1998] BC J No 2812 (QL), 1998 CanLII 5749 (SC) ................... 224 McColman , R v , 2023 SCC 8 .................................................... 74 McColman , R v , 2021 ONCA 382 ............................................. 86, 92 McConnell , R v , 2018 ABCA 51......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...84, 412 R v McClelland, 2012 ONSC 7207.............................................................. 180, 181 R v McColman, 2023 SCC 8 ......................................................................... 98, 103 R v McCrimmon, 2010 SCC 36..................................... 344, 359, ......
  • Is the Detention Lawful?
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...employ the technology, did the oicer activate the 46 Traic Safety Act , RSA 2000, c T-6, s 1(1)(p). 47 R v McColman , infra note 48. 48 2023 SCC 8 at paras 46, 47. 49 R v Peel , 2003 NSPC 66 at para 8; R v Mitchell , 2019 ONSC 2613 at para 73. 50 Hufsky , supra note 25 at 627; R v Tully , 2......