R. v. McCrae and Ramsay, (1981) 25 Man.R.(2d) 32 (CoCt)
| Court | Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada) |
| Case Date | March 18, 1981 |
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Citations | (1981), 25 Man.R.(2d) 32 (CoCt) |
R. v. McCrae (1981), 25 Man.R.(2d) 32 (CoCt)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. McCrae and Ramsay
Indexed As: R. v. McCrae and Ramsay
Manitoba County Court
Kennedy, C.C.J.
March 18, 1981.
Summary:
The accused were acquitted on two charges of operating a plane without proper authorization contrary to the Aeronautics Act. The Crown appealed.
The Manitoba County Court dismissed the appeal.
Aeronautics - Topic 3108
Offences - Aircraft operation - Flying without authorization - Evidence required - Two accused were charged under the Aeronautics Act of operating an aircraft without proper authorization between January 10 and February 13, 1978 - The accused argued that the evidence adduced by the Crown did not establish that the offence occurred between the dates contained in the information - The Manitoba County Court agreed and acquitted the accused - The court stated that since the case turned upon the holding of a valid certificate during a particular time, the dates specified became an essential part of the offence which had to be proved - See paragraphs 1 to 8.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. England, 35 C.C.C. 141, refd to. [para. 7].
R. v. Parkin, 27 C.C.C. 35, refd to. [para. 7].
Severo Dossi, 13 Crim. App. Rep. 158, refd to. [para. 5].
Statutes Noticed:
Aeronautics Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. A-3, sect. 6(4) [paras. 2 to 8].
Counsel:
B.H. Hay, for the appellant;
W.D. Kitchen, for the respondents.
This appeal was heard before Kennedy, C.C.J., of the Manitoba County Court, who delivered the following judgment on March 18, 1981:
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Table of cases
...364–67, 371 R v McCormack (1984), 28 Man R (2d) 29, [1984] MJ No 158 (CA) ................ 535 R v McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man R (2d) 32, [ 1981] MJ No 469 (Co Ct) ..............................................................................501 R v McCraw, [1991] 3 SCR 72, 66 CCC (3d)......
-
The Trial Process
.... 91 R v Douglas , [1991] 1 SCR 301 [ Douglas ]. 92 See R v Hamilton-Middleton (1986), 53 Sask R 80 (CA), and R v McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man R (2d) 32 (Co Ct). 93 [1990] 2 SCR 30 at para 11 [ B(G) ]. See also R v SD , 2011 SCC 14. 94 See B(G) itself, above note 93; R v Dossi (1918), 1......
-
The Trial Process
...77 This is consistent with section 71 See R. v. Hamilton-Middleton (1986), 53 Sask. R. 80 (C.A.) and R. v. McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man. R. (2d) 32 (Co. Ct.). 72 [1990] 2 S.C.R. 30 at para. 11 [ B.(G.) ]. 73 See B.(G.) itself, ibid .; R. v. Dossi (1918), 13 Cr. App. R. 158; R. v. Parkin......
-
The Trial Process
...should be negatived,” but goes further. 76 See R. v. Hamilton-Middleton (1986), 53 Sask. R. 80 (C.A.) and R. v. McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man. R. (2d) 32 (Co. Ct.). 77 [1990] 2 S.C.R. 30 at para. 11 [ B.(G.) ]. See also R. v. S.D. , 2011 SCC 14. 78 See B.(G.) itself, ibid .; R. v. Dossi ......
-
R. v. Del Bianco (D.J.), (2008) 456 A.R. 134 (QB)
...217; 316 N.R. 203, refd to. [para. 55]. R. v. Moore, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1097; 85 N.R. 195, refd to. [para. 57]. R. v. McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man.R.(2d) 32 (Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. R. v. Alexander, 2005 BCPC 480, refd to. [para. 79]. R. v. Sault Ste. Marie (City) (1978), 21 N.R. 295; 40......
-
R. v. G.B. et al. (No. 2), (1990) 111 N.R. 31 (SCC)
...C.R.N.S. 379, refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. Labine (1975), 23 C.C.C.(2d) 567 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man.R.(2d) 32 (Co. Ct.), consd. [para. R. v. Sarson (1982), 15 Man.R.(2d) 192 (Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. Parkin (1), (2) (1922), 37 C.C.C......
-
R. v. G.B. et al. (No. 2), (1990) 86 Sask.R. 111 (SCC)
...C.R.N.S. 379, refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. Labine (1975), 23 C.C.C.(2d) 567 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man.R.(2d) 32 (Co. Ct.), consd. [para. R. v. Sarson (1982), 15 Man.R.(2d) 192 (Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. Parkin (1), (2) (1922), 37 C.C.C......
-
R. v. Tarnovsky (B.), (1995) 80 O.A.C. 126 (CA)
...11]. R. v. M.B.P., [1994] 1 S.C.R. 555; 165 N.R. 321; 70 O.A.C. 161; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 289, consd. [para. 11]. R. v. McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man.R.(2d) 32 (Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. R. v. M.H.C., [1991] 1 S.C.R. 763; 123 N.R. 63; 63 C.C.C.(3d) 385; 4 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 23]. Statu......
-
Table of cases
...364–67, 371 R v McCormack (1984), 28 Man R (2d) 29, [1984] MJ No 158 (CA) ................ 535 R v McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man R (2d) 32, [ 1981] MJ No 469 (Co Ct) ..............................................................................501 R v McCraw, [1991] 3 SCR 72, 66 CCC (3d)......
-
The Trial Process
.... 91 R v Douglas , [1991] 1 SCR 301 [ Douglas ]. 92 See R v Hamilton-Middleton (1986), 53 Sask R 80 (CA), and R v McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man R (2d) 32 (Co Ct). 93 [1990] 2 SCR 30 at para 11 [ B(G) ]. See also R v SD , 2011 SCC 14. 94 See B(G) itself, above note 93; R v Dossi (1918), 1......
-
The Trial Process
...77 This is consistent with section 71 See R. v. Hamilton-Middleton (1986), 53 Sask. R. 80 (C.A.) and R. v. McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man. R. (2d) 32 (Co. Ct.). 72 [1990] 2 S.C.R. 30 at para. 11 [ B.(G.) ]. 73 See B.(G.) itself, ibid .; R. v. Dossi (1918), 13 Cr. App. R. 158; R. v. Parkin......
-
The Trial Process
...should be negatived,” but goes further. 76 See R. v. Hamilton-Middleton (1986), 53 Sask. R. 80 (C.A.) and R. v. McCrae and Ramsay (1981), 25 Man. R. (2d) 32 (Co. Ct.). 77 [1990] 2 S.C.R. 30 at para. 11 [ B.(G.) ]. See also R. v. S.D. , 2011 SCC 14. 78 See B.(G.) itself, ibid .; R. v. Dossi ......