R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | SCHRECK J. |
| Citation | 2018 ONSC 2006 |
| Date | 27 March 2018 |
| Docket Number | CR-17-70000217-MO |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R. v. Singh,
...support an inference of planning and deliberation: R. v. Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1, at para. 18, cited with approval by R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at paras. 32-34. However, the weight of authority is that evidence of motive and animus can relate to and help establish intent, as well as p......
-
R. v. Rego,
...having an opportunity to plan and deliberate and proof of planning and deliberation: see Robinson, at para. 40; R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at para. 32; R. v. Quesnel (1991), 4 C.R. (4th) 118 (Man. C.A.), at para. 18. [59] Finally, the preliminar......
-
R v Whitehead,
...and deliberation in all circumstances: R v Evaloakjuk, 2001 CanLII 39421 (Nu CA) at paras 17, 18, 20 and 21; and R v McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006 at para 34. [41] Evidence of violence directed towards a different victim can be used in some cir......
-
R. v. Smeltzer,
...of first degree murder on the basis that it was planned and deliberate: see e.g. R v Hall, 2021 ONSC 28 at paras 318-9; R v McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006 at paras 33-34; R v Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1 at para 18. Otherwise, as noted by some of these authorities, where there was evidence of a motive......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R. v. Singh,
...support an inference of planning and deliberation: R. v. Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1, at para. 18, cited with approval by R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at paras. 32-34. However, the weight of authority is that evidence of motive and animus can relate to and help establish intent, as well as p......
-
R. v. Rego,
...having an opportunity to plan and deliberate and proof of planning and deliberation: see Robinson, at para. 40; R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at para. 32; R. v. Quesnel (1991), 4 C.R. (4th) 118 (Man. C.A.), at para. 18. [59] Finally, the preliminar......
-
R v Whitehead,
...and deliberation in all circumstances: R v Evaloakjuk, 2001 CanLII 39421 (Nu CA) at paras 17, 18, 20 and 21; and R v McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006 at para 34. [41] Evidence of violence directed towards a different victim can be used in some cir......
-
R. v. Smeltzer,
...of first degree murder on the basis that it was planned and deliberate: see e.g. R v Hall, 2021 ONSC 28 at paras 318-9; R v McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006 at paras 33-34; R v Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1 at para 18. Otherwise, as noted by some of these authorities, where there was evidence of a motive......
Request a trial to view additional results