R v McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86
| Judge | Honourable Judge Bruce R. Fraser |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | May 11, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2020 ABPC 86 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R v Daytec,
...failed or refused to provide a suitable sample. [57] This is the same conclusion reached by my brother Judge Fraser in R. v. McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86. There Judge Fraser was considering the proper interpretation of the current S. 320.15(1), the same section under which Mr. Daytec is charged i......
-
R v Slowinski,
...this jurisdiction that concludes that the onus still remains on an accused notwithstanding the repeal of s. 794(2) CC - see R v McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86 at paras 29-32 (subsequently followed in R v Daytec, 2021 ABPC 48). Fortunately, it is not absolutely essential to decide that issue in this......
-
R v Turnbull,
...doubt [are] that the accused knew a demand had been made and she failed to supply a suitable sample of her breath": R v McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86 at para 22. The Crown need not prove that the accused person intentionally or wilfully failed or refused to provide a suitable breath sample: R......
-
Hayley Bradley v. Her Majesty the Queen,
...[72] R. v. Turnbull, 2021 ABPC 163 [73] Turnbull, supra at para. 36 [74] R. v. Peterson, 2019 NBCA 42, at para. 7 [75] R. v. McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86 [76] McKinnon, supra at para. 20 [77] McKinnon, supra at paras. 22-23 [78] R. v. Goleski, 2015 SCC 6 [79] R. v. Crosthwaite, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 10......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R v Daytec,
...failed or refused to provide a suitable sample. [57] This is the same conclusion reached by my brother Judge Fraser in R. v. McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86. There Judge Fraser was considering the proper interpretation of the current S. 320.15(1), the same section under which Mr. Daytec is charged i......
-
R v Slowinski,
...this jurisdiction that concludes that the onus still remains on an accused notwithstanding the repeal of s. 794(2) CC - see R v McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86 at paras 29-32 (subsequently followed in R v Daytec, 2021 ABPC 48). Fortunately, it is not absolutely essential to decide that issue in this......
-
R v Turnbull,
...doubt [are] that the accused knew a demand had been made and she failed to supply a suitable sample of her breath": R v McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86 at para 22. The Crown need not prove that the accused person intentionally or wilfully failed or refused to provide a suitable breath sample: R......
-
Hayley Bradley v. Her Majesty the Queen,
...[72] R. v. Turnbull, 2021 ABPC 163 [73] Turnbull, supra at para. 36 [74] R. v. Peterson, 2019 NBCA 42, at para. 7 [75] R. v. McKinnon, 2020 ABPC 86 [76] McKinnon, supra at para. 20 [77] McKinnon, supra at paras. 22-23 [78] R. v. Goleski, 2015 SCC 6 [79] R. v. Crosthwaite, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 10......
Request a trial to view additional results