R. v. McRae

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeLeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard
Docket Number34743
Date06 December 2013
Citation[2013] 3 SCR 931,2013 SCC 68,110 WCB (2d) 787,366 DLR (4th) 337,451 NR 375,[2013] CarswellQue 11603,JE 2013-2109
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
67 practice notes
  • R. v. Steele,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 9, 2014
    ...[2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Johnson, 2003 SCC 46, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 357; R. v. Smith, 2012 ONCA 645 (CanLII); R. v. McRae, 2013 SCC 68, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 931; R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697; R. v. Khawaja, 2012 SCC 69, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 555; R. v. Goulet, 2011 ABCA 230, 52 Alta. L.R. (5th) 24......
  • R. v. A.A.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 2, 2014
    ...[para. 95]. R. v. Katigbak (R.), [2011] 3 S.C.R. 326; 422 N.R. 1; 283 O.A.C. 331; 2011 SCC 48, refd to. [para. 101]. R. v. McRae (S.), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 931; 451 N.R. 375; 2013 SCC 68, refd to. [para. 101]. R. v. Cassidy, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 345; 100 N.R. 321; 36 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 101]. R......
  • R. v. Kelly (J.J.), (2015) 607 A.R. 179
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 27, 2015
    ...R. v. Clemente (V.F.), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 758; 168 N.R. 310; 95 Man.R.(2d) 161; 70 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. McRae (S.), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 931; 451 N.R. 375; 2013 SCC 68, refd to. [para. R. v. Mahalingan (R.), [2008] 3 S.C.R. 316; 381 N.R. 199; 243 O.A.C. 252; 2008 SCC 63, refd to. ......
  • R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 5, 2018
    ...the complainant. Even as to threats, speaking to third parties is not an unusual fact pattern in the law: see eg R v McRae, 2013 SCC 68, [2013] 3 SCR 931.[58] It is not necessary to tarry on the alternative as to communication inasmuch as the trial judge found “contact” in the wilful action......
  • Get Started for Free
60 cases
  • R. v. Steele,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 9, 2014
    ...[2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Johnson, 2003 SCC 46, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 357; R. v. Smith, 2012 ONCA 645 (CanLII); R. v. McRae, 2013 SCC 68, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 931; R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697; R. v. Khawaja, 2012 SCC 69, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 555; R. v. Goulet, 2011 ABCA 230, 52 Alta. L.R. (5th) 24......
  • R. v. A.A.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 2, 2014
    ...[para. 95]. R. v. Katigbak (R.), [2011] 3 S.C.R. 326; 422 N.R. 1; 283 O.A.C. 331; 2011 SCC 48, refd to. [para. 101]. R. v. McRae (S.), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 931; 451 N.R. 375; 2013 SCC 68, refd to. [para. 101]. R. v. Cassidy, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 345; 100 N.R. 321; 36 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 101]. R......
  • R. v. Kelly (J.J.), (2015) 607 A.R. 179
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 27, 2015
    ...R. v. Clemente (V.F.), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 758; 168 N.R. 310; 95 Man.R.(2d) 161; 70 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. McRae (S.), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 931; 451 N.R. 375; 2013 SCC 68, refd to. [para. R. v. Mahalingan (R.), [2008] 3 S.C.R. 316; 381 N.R. 199; 243 O.A.C. 252; 2008 SCC 63, refd to. ......
  • R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 5, 2018
    ...the complainant. Even as to threats, speaking to third parties is not an unusual fact pattern in the law: see eg R v McRae, 2013 SCC 68, [2013] 3 SCR 931.[58] It is not necessary to tarry on the alternative as to communication inasmuch as the trial judge found “contact” in the wilful action......
  • Get Started for Free