R. v. Millar (T.), [2003] B.C.A.C. Uned. 62

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeRowles, J.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,COURTS,PRACTICE
Date17 March 2003
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. J.B.C. Securities Ltd. et al., (2003) 261 N.B.R.(2d) 199 (CA)
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • April 8, 2003
    ...169; [2002] S.J. No. 592; 2002 SKQB 371 (Sask. Q.B.; Ball, J.), and R. v. Millar (T.) , [2003] B.C.A.C. Uned. 62; [2003] B.C.J. No. 556; 2003 BCCA 164 (C.A.; Rowles, J.A.). [14] Rule 59.01 provides that costs of a proceeding are in the discretion of the court. In fixing costs, the court may......
  • R. v. Anderson (D.A.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2002 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 24, 2014
    ...them against prosecution for violation of ITA provisions: see R. v. McMordie, 2001 BCCA 412; R. v. Bruno , 2002 BCCA 348; and R. Millar , 2003 BCCA 164. [56] In McMordie, the appellant had been charged with failing to comply with a 'notice of requirement' pursuant to s. 239 of the ITA . Hav......
2 cases
  • R. v. J.B.C. Securities Ltd. et al., (2003) 261 N.B.R.(2d) 199 (CA)
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • April 8, 2003
    ...169; [2002] S.J. No. 592; 2002 SKQB 371 (Sask. Q.B.; Ball, J.), and R. v. Millar (T.) , [2003] B.C.A.C. Uned. 62; [2003] B.C.J. No. 556; 2003 BCCA 164 (C.A.; Rowles, J.A.). [14] Rule 59.01 provides that costs of a proceeding are in the discretion of the court. In fixing costs, the court may......
  • R. v. Anderson (D.A.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2002 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 24, 2014
    ...them against prosecution for violation of ITA provisions: see R. v. McMordie, 2001 BCCA 412; R. v. Bruno , 2002 BCCA 348; and R. Millar , 2003 BCCA 164. [56] In McMordie, the appellant had been charged with failing to comply with a 'notice of requirement' pursuant to s. 239 of the ITA . Hav......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT