R. v. Mohamed, Islow

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgeR.F. GOLDSTEIN J.
Citation2020 ONSC 5074
Docket NumberCR-18-50000593-0000
Date24 August 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Oppong,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 25 Mayo 2021
    ...in order to understand the context in which the central events took place: see e.g. Mills, at para. 24; R. v. Mohamed, Islow and Miller, 2020 ONSC 5074, at paras. 44-51; R. v. Gager, 2012 ONSC 388, at paras. 160-161, aff’d 2020 ONCA 274; R. v. Monney, 2017 ONSC 250, at paras. 51-52; ......
  • 2025 ONCA 611,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2025
    ...No. 255. 142 In his reasons, the trial judge carefully outlined the law on expert opinion evidence: R. v. Mohamed, Islow, and Miller, 2020 ONSC 5074. He clearly had a good grasp on those principles of law and carefully and methodically applied 143 I would defer to the trial judge's finding ......
  • R v Mohamed,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 5 Septiembre 2025
    ...No. 255. 142 In his reasons, the trial judge carefully outlined the law on expert opinion evidence: R. v. Mohamed, Islow, and Miller, 2020 ONSC 5074. He clearly had a good grasp on those principles of law and carefully and methodically applied 143 I would defer to the trial judge's finding ......
3 cases
  • R. v. Oppong
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 25 Mayo 2021
    ...in order to understand the context in which the central events took place: see e.g. Mills, at para. 24; R. v. Mohamed, Islow and Miller, 2020 ONSC 5074, at paras. 44-51; R. v. Gager, 2012 ONSC 388, at paras. 160-161, aff’d 2020 ONCA 274; R. v. Monney, 2017 ONSC 250, at paras. 51-52; ......
  • 2025 ONCA 611
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2025
    ...No. 255. 142 In his reasons, the trial judge carefully outlined the law on expert opinion evidence: R. v. Mohamed, Islow, and Miller, 2020 ONSC 5074. He clearly had a good grasp on those principles of law and carefully and methodically applied 143 I would defer to the trial judge's finding ......
  • R v Mohamed
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 5 Septiembre 2025
    ...No. 255. 142 In his reasons, the trial judge carefully outlined the law on expert opinion evidence: R. v. Mohamed, Islow, and Miller, 2020 ONSC 5074. He clearly had a good grasp on those principles of law and carefully and methodically applied 143 I would defer to the trial judge's finding ......