R. v. Morris (K.A.), 2011 ONSC 5142

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHarvison Young, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Subject MatterPOLICE,CIVIL RIGHTS
Citation2011 ONSC 5142,[2011] O.T.C. Uned. 5142 (SC),[2011] O.T.C. Uned. 5142
Date06 September 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 105
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 20 Enero 2017
    ...131 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (Ont. C.A.). [16] The Crown also relies on R. v. Humphrey, 2011 ONSC 3024; R. v. Kaddoura, 2009 BCCA 113; R. v. Morris, 2011 ONSC 5142, aff’d, 2013 ONCA 223; R. v. Nolet, 2010 SCC 24; and R. v. Waldron, 2003 BCCA Has there been a breach of the Accused’s s. 9 and/or s. 10(a......
  • Wednesday: What’s Hot on CanLII
    • Canada
    • Slaw Canada’s Online Legal Magazine
    • 11 Noviembre 2015
    ...we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. For this last week: 1. R. v. Morris, 2011 ONSC 5142 12. The defence argued that, because the police did not believe Mr. Morris had committed an HTA infraction, they did not have an HTA-related purpose for stopping Mr. Morris’ vehicle. I......
  • R. v. Morris (K.A.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 22 Marzo 2013
    ...violation of his s. 10(b) right, and that the seized items should not be excluded from evidence pursuant to s. 24(2): see R. v. Morris , 2011 ONSC 5142, 87 C.R. (6th) 362. [3] The appellant submits that the trial judge erred in fact and in law in finding that police officers involved in the......
2 cases
  • R. v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 105
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 20 Enero 2017
    ...131 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (Ont. C.A.). [16] The Crown also relies on R. v. Humphrey, 2011 ONSC 3024; R. v. Kaddoura, 2009 BCCA 113; R. v. Morris, 2011 ONSC 5142, aff’d, 2013 ONCA 223; R. v. Nolet, 2010 SCC 24; and R. v. Waldron, 2003 BCCA Has there been a breach of the Accused’s s. 9 and/or s. 10(a......
  • R. v. Morris (K.A.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 22 Marzo 2013
    ...violation of his s. 10(b) right, and that the seized items should not be excluded from evidence pursuant to s. 24(2): see R. v. Morris , 2011 ONSC 5142, 87 C.R. (6th) 362. [3] The appellant submits that the trial judge erred in fact and in law in finding that police officers involved in the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT