R. v. Morris (K.A.), 2011 ONSC 5142
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Harvison Young, J. |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Subject Matter | POLICE,CIVIL RIGHTS |
Citation | 2011 ONSC 5142,[2011] O.T.C. Uned. 5142 (SC),[2011] O.T.C. Uned. 5142 |
Date | 06 September 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 105
...131 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (Ont. C.A.). [16] The Crown also relies on R. v. Humphrey, 2011 ONSC 3024; R. v. Kaddoura, 2009 BCCA 113; R. v. Morris, 2011 ONSC 5142, aff’d, 2013 ONCA 223; R. v. Nolet, 2010 SCC 24; and R. v. Waldron, 2003 BCCA Has there been a breach of the Accused’s s. 9 and/or s. 10(a......
-
Wednesday: What’s Hot on CanLII
...we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. For this last week: 1. R. v. Morris, 2011 ONSC 5142 12. The defence argued that, because the police did not believe Mr. Morris had committed an HTA infraction, they did not have an HTA-related purpose for stopping Mr. Morris’ vehicle. I......
-
R. v. Morris (K.A.),
...violation of his s. 10(b) right, and that the seized items should not be excluded from evidence pursuant to s. 24(2): see R. v. Morris , 2011 ONSC 5142, 87 C.R. (6th) 362. [3] The appellant submits that the trial judge erred in fact and in law in finding that police officers involved in the......
2 cases
-
R. v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 105
...131 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (Ont. C.A.). [16] The Crown also relies on R. v. Humphrey, 2011 ONSC 3024; R. v. Kaddoura, 2009 BCCA 113; R. v. Morris, 2011 ONSC 5142, aff’d, 2013 ONCA 223; R. v. Nolet, 2010 SCC 24; and R. v. Waldron, 2003 BCCA Has there been a breach of the Accused’s s. 9 and/or s. 10(a......
-
R. v. Morris (K.A.),
...violation of his s. 10(b) right, and that the seized items should not be excluded from evidence pursuant to s. 24(2): see R. v. Morris , 2011 ONSC 5142, 87 C.R. (6th) 362. [3] The appellant submits that the trial judge erred in fact and in law in finding that police officers involved in the......