R v MR, 2019 ABQB 588
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice John T. Henderson |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 588 |
| Docket Number | 170526271Q1 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 07 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Capital City News Group Ltd. v. British Columbia,
...tool. For example, it has been used as a verification tool in assessing the voluntariness of a confession (R. v. M.R., 2019 ABQB 588 at para. 78) and as a measure of reliability in the context of a Mr. Big undercover operation (see e.g. R. v. Hart, 2014 SCC 52 at para. 105; R. v. Lede......
-
R v Tessier, 2020 ABCA 289
...by police and in the adversarial process of the trial: Oickle at para 69; Singh at para 35; R v Patterson, 2017 SCC 15 at para 15; R v MR 2019 ABQB 588 at paras 45-49. [26] The confessions rule also balances two important goals: protecting the rights of the accused without unduly limiting s......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,
...discuss the use of holdback information as a verification tool in assessing a confession, whether in relation to voluntariness (R v MR, 2019 ABQB 588), or as a measure of reliability in the context of a “Mr. Big” operation (R v Hart, 2014 SCC 52; R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117). T......
3 cases
-
Capital City News Group Ltd. v. British Columbia,
...tool. For example, it has been used as a verification tool in assessing the voluntariness of a confession (R. v. M.R., 2019 ABQB 588 at para. 78) and as a measure of reliability in the context of a Mr. Big undercover operation (see e.g. R. v. Hart, 2014 SCC 52 at para. 105; R. v. Lede......
-
R v Tessier, 2020 ABCA 289
...by police and in the adversarial process of the trial: Oickle at para 69; Singh at para 35; R v Patterson, 2017 SCC 15 at para 15; R v MR 2019 ABQB 588 at paras 45-49. [26] The confessions rule also balances two important goals: protecting the rights of the accused without unduly limiting s......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,
...discuss the use of holdback information as a verification tool in assessing a confession, whether in relation to voluntariness (R v MR, 2019 ABQB 588), or as a measure of reliability in the context of a “Mr. Big” operation (R v Hart, 2014 SCC 52; R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117). T......