R. v. Nakamura (Y.) et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 327
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Romilly, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Citation | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 327,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 327 (SC),2012 BCSC 327 |
Date | 02 March 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
29 practice notes
-
R. v. McConnell (R.T.), 2014 BCSC 1743
...following authorities: R. v. Taylor , 2014 BCCA 304; R. v. Almotairi , 2013 BCSC 2132; R. v. Nicholls , 2013 BCSC 1145; R. v. Nakamura , 2012 BCSC 327; R. v. Tang , 2011CanLII 45974; R. v. Foster , 2008 BCSC 1369; R. v. Sultan , 2007 BCSC 849; R. v. Dhesi , 2002 BCCA 459; and R. v. Belisari......
-
R. v. Leslie (C.A.) et al., 2012 BCSC 1888
...the same delict. While its purpose is easily articulated, its application can be "notoriously difficult to apply." See: R. v. Nakamura , 2012 BCSC 327 at para. 50. [44] For the purposes of the discussion in this case, important to the determination of whether the rule in Kienapple applies i......
-
R. v. Sanghera (A.S.), (2016) 389 B.C.A.C. 111 (CA)
...aggravated assault or assault causing bodily harm, a sentence of seven to ten months' imprisonment is appropriate (see R. v. Nakamura , 2012 BCSC 327; R. v. J.C.B. , 2009 BCPC 260; R. v. Samoilov , 2013 ABCA 261; R. v. Hurley , 2008 BCSC 986, aff'd 2008 BCCA 461; R. v. Vang (1999), 132 C.C.......
-
R. v. Emery, 2019 BCSC 1789
...Nielsen (October 31, 2012), Kamloops, 90155; to robbery: R. v. Cain (1993), 28 B.C.A.C. 105; to other violent offences: R. v. Nakamura, 2012 BCSC 327; to possession for the purpose of trafficking: Voong. See also: R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6 at para. 44; R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at paras......
Get Started for Free
30 cases
-
R. v. McConnell (R.T.), 2014 BCSC 1743
...following authorities: R. v. Taylor , 2014 BCCA 304; R. v. Almotairi , 2013 BCSC 2132; R. v. Nicholls , 2013 BCSC 1145; R. v. Nakamura , 2012 BCSC 327; R. v. Tang , 2011CanLII 45974; R. v. Foster , 2008 BCSC 1369; R. v. Sultan , 2007 BCSC 849; R. v. Dhesi , 2002 BCCA 459; and R. v. Belisari......
-
R. v. Leslie (C.A.) et al., 2012 BCSC 1888
...the same delict. While its purpose is easily articulated, its application can be "notoriously difficult to apply." See: R. v. Nakamura , 2012 BCSC 327 at para. 50. [44] For the purposes of the discussion in this case, important to the determination of whether the rule in Kienapple applies i......
-
R. v. Dario (E.E.), 2015 BCSC 1149
...BCSC 1401; R. v. Rai , 2013 BCSC 1826; R. v. McCalla , [2000] O.J. No. 399 (C.A.); R v. Cloutier , 2008 ABPC 372; and R. v. Nakamura , 2012 BCSC 327. [25] The Crown submits that the case law establishes a broad range of sentences for the offence of aggravated assault, a range spanning from ......
-
R. v. Sanghera (A.S.), (2016) 389 B.C.A.C. 111 (CA)
...aggravated assault or assault causing bodily harm, a sentence of seven to ten months' imprisonment is appropriate (see R. v. Nakamura , 2012 BCSC 327; R. v. J.C.B. , 2009 BCPC 260; R. v. Samoilov , 2013 ABCA 261; R. v. Hurley , 2008 BCSC 986, aff'd 2008 BCCA 461; R. v. Vang (1999), 132 C.C.......
Get Started for Free