R v Napope
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Caldwell,Kalmakoff,McMurtry |
| Citation | 2023 SKCA 1 |
| Date | 04 January 2023 |
| Docket Number | CACR3470 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
R v. Stevenson
...question of risk”, that could he impose an indeterminate sentence (Boutilier at para 69). As articulated by Kalmakoff J.A. in R v Napope, 2023 SKCA 1 at para 22, 421 CCC (3d) 447, “[m]aking this call requires sentencing judges to address head-on the question of whether something less than a......
-
R v. Laprise
...judge has no choice but to impose an indeterminate sentence. See R v Straub, 2022 ONCA 47 at para 62, 160 OR (3d) 721, and R v Napope, 2023 SKCA 1 at paras 30-31, 421 CCC (3d) Gladue Considerations under Part XXIV [25] &......
-
R v. Sewap
...at paras 49–53; R v Montgrand, 2014 SKCA 31 at paras 16–17, 433 Sask R 248; Ballantyne at para 23; Laprise at paras 35–36; and R v Napope, 2023 SKCA 1 at para 27, 421 CCC (3d) [60] Mr. Sewap contends that, although the judge acknowledged the need to......
-
R. v. Dionne
...is a more stringent standard than the previous threshold of a “reasonable possibility” (see R. v. Straub, 2022 ONCA 47, and R v. Napope, 2023 SKCA 1). For example, the Ontario Court of Appeal noted in Straub, supra: …The standard is “reasonable expectation”, a higher standard than “reasonab......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
R v. Stevenson
...question of risk”, that could he impose an indeterminate sentence (Boutilier at para 69). As articulated by Kalmakoff J.A. in R v Napope, 2023 SKCA 1 at para 22, 421 CCC (3d) 447, “[m]aking this call requires sentencing judges to address head-on the question of whether something less than a......
-
R v. Laprise
...judge has no choice but to impose an indeterminate sentence. See R v Straub, 2022 ONCA 47 at para 62, 160 OR (3d) 721, and R v Napope, 2023 SKCA 1 at paras 30-31, 421 CCC (3d) Gladue Considerations under Part XXIV [25] &......
-
R v. Sewap
...at paras 49–53; R v Montgrand, 2014 SKCA 31 at paras 16–17, 433 Sask R 248; Ballantyne at para 23; Laprise at paras 35–36; and R v Napope, 2023 SKCA 1 at para 27, 421 CCC (3d) [60] Mr. Sewap contends that, although the judge acknowledged the need to......
-
R. v. Dionne
...is a more stringent standard than the previous threshold of a “reasonable possibility” (see R. v. Straub, 2022 ONCA 47, and R v. Napope, 2023 SKCA 1). For example, the Ontario Court of Appeal noted in Straub, supra: …The standard is “reasonable expectation”, a higher standard than “reasonab......
Get Started for Free
