R v Natomagan,
| Judge | Antonio,Pentelechuk,Strekaf |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 48 |
| Date | 11 February 2022 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2003-0008-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
R v Napope,
...that a lesser sentence will achieve that goal, the court must impose an indeterminate sentence ( Boutilier at para 70; R v Natomagan, 2022 ABCA 48 at para 22 Making this call requires sentencing judges to address head-on the question of whether something less than an indeterminate sentence ......
-
R v Bird,
...indeterminate detention” ( Boutilier at para 46; see also: R v Wolfleg, 2018 ABCA 222 at para 71, 363 CCC 3(d) 168; R v Natomagan, 2022 ABCA 48 at para 94 [ 41 The Crown argues, as set out above, that the trial judge failed to analyse future risk in the manner required by s. 753(1)(a......
-
2023 ABKB 192,
...reference Le for its commentary on race-based discrimination in police practices in Canada: see Theriault (ONCA) and R v Natomagan, 2022 ABCA 48 as recent 16 In response to the Crown's submission that the trial judge erred in failing to factor race into her sentencing decision, the Def......
-
R v Dunn,
...reference Le for its commentary on race-based discrimination in police practices in Canada: see Theriault (ONCA) and R v Natomagan, 2022 ABCA 48 as recent 16 In response to the Crown's submission that the trial judge erred in failing to factor race into her sentencing decision, the Def......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
R v Napope,
...that a lesser sentence will achieve that goal, the court must impose an indeterminate sentence ( Boutilier at para 70; R v Natomagan, 2022 ABCA 48 at para 22 Making this call requires sentencing judges to address head-on the question of whether something less than an indeterminate sentence ......
-
R v Bird,
...indeterminate detention” ( Boutilier at para 46; see also: R v Wolfleg, 2018 ABCA 222 at para 71, 363 CCC 3(d) 168; R v Natomagan, 2022 ABCA 48 at para 94 [ 41 The Crown argues, as set out above, that the trial judge failed to analyse future risk in the manner required by s. 753(1)(a......
-
2023 ABKB 192,
...reference Le for its commentary on race-based discrimination in police practices in Canada: see Theriault (ONCA) and R v Natomagan, 2022 ABCA 48 as recent 16 In response to the Crown's submission that the trial judge erred in failing to factor race into her sentencing decision, the Def......
-
R v Dunn,
...reference Le for its commentary on race-based discrimination in police practices in Canada: see Theriault (ONCA) and R v Natomagan, 2022 ABCA 48 as recent 16 In response to the Crown's submission that the trial judge erred in failing to factor race into her sentencing decision, the Def......
Request a trial to view additional results