R v Navia, 2020 ABPC 20
| Judge | Honourable Judge G.D.M. Stirling |
| Docket Number | 180954075P1 |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 24 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
R. v. NK,
...cases, defence counsel has, as in the present case, provided copies of the documents to both the court and the Crown: R v. Navia, 2020 ABPC 20. In at least one case, defence counsel did not provide the documents to either the court or the Crown, but instead provided a description of th......
-
R v Harnett,
...satisfied the requirement of applying in writing with detailed particulars of the evidence sought to be adduced. I refer to R v Navia, 2020 ABPC 20, Stirling PCJ at paras 59 and 64 and the discussion in the Prior Decision at paras (b) Service [45] T......
-
R v Harnett,
...parties) that a complainant does not have standing on the preliminary issue of whether a record meets the s. 278.1 definition: R v Navia, 2020 ABPC 20 at para (b) Section 278.1 – “Record” [63] The text messages were “reco......
-
R v Farah, 2021 YKSC 36
...to be used for making this decision so that records that have an insufficient level of privacy are not caught by the Regime (R v Navia, 2020 ABPC 20; R v WM, 2019 ONSC 6535; R v Nirlungayuk, 2021 NUCJ b) the Regime infringes an accused’s righ......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
R. v. NK,
...cases, defence counsel has, as in the present case, provided copies of the documents to both the court and the Crown: R v. Navia, 2020 ABPC 20. In at least one case, defence counsel did not provide the documents to either the court or the Crown, but instead provided a description of th......
-
R v Harnett,
...satisfied the requirement of applying in writing with detailed particulars of the evidence sought to be adduced. I refer to R v Navia, 2020 ABPC 20, Stirling PCJ at paras 59 and 64 and the discussion in the Prior Decision at paras (b) Service [45] T......
-
R v Harnett,
...parties) that a complainant does not have standing on the preliminary issue of whether a record meets the s. 278.1 definition: R v Navia, 2020 ABPC 20 at para (b) Section 278.1 – “Record” [63] The text messages were “reco......
-
R v Farah, 2021 YKSC 36
...to be used for making this decision so that records that have an insufficient level of privacy are not caught by the Regime (R v Navia, 2020 ABPC 20; R v WM, 2019 ONSC 6535; R v Nirlungayuk, 2021 NUCJ b) the Regime infringes an accused’s righ......
Request a trial to view additional results