R. v. Nilsson (T.A.), 2012 BCSC 320

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeWalker, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW
Citation2012 BCSC 320,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 320,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 320 (SC)
Date10 January 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Rudolph (B.J.), 2012 SKQB 442
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 29, 2012
    ...(M.B.) (2009), 324 Sask.R. 263; 451 W.A.C. 263; 2009 SKCA 46, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Nilsson (T.A.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 320; 2012 BCSC 320, refd to. [para. R. v. Wozny (C.P.) (2010), 262 Man.R.(2d) 75; 507 W.A.C. 75; 2010 MBCA 115, refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Hung et al. (1990), 113 A......
  • LLS America LLC (Trustee of) v. Dill, 2017 BCSC 469
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 23, 2017
    ...in the sense that they could be revived status quo ante and could, pending restoration, be sued: see, e.g., Saini v. Grand Forks (City), 2012 BCSC 320 at paras. 23-24. Accordingly, he says that the Consolidation Order properly included [71]        ......
  • R. v. MacIsaac (R.H.M.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2548 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 18, 2014
    ...in this case, it does have factual similarities to this case. [34] Crown also relies on R. v. Wilson , 2008 ONCA 510 and R. v. Nilsson , 2012 BCSC 320 which was affirmed at 2012 BCCA 498. [35] Wilson , was significantly more serious than the present case and is of limited value. [36] In Nil......
  • R. v. Gagnon,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 16, 2021
    ...to kill her, suggests an escalation of his violent behaviour. [41] As was set out at para. 43 of the reasons at trial in R. v. Nilsson, 2012 BCSC 320: [43] Robberies are an intolerable invasion of an individual’s sense of security and often result in ongoing fear and anxiety suffered by vic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. Rudolph (B.J.), 2012 SKQB 442
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 29, 2012
    ...(M.B.) (2009), 324 Sask.R. 263; 451 W.A.C. 263; 2009 SKCA 46, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Nilsson (T.A.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 320; 2012 BCSC 320, refd to. [para. R. v. Wozny (C.P.) (2010), 262 Man.R.(2d) 75; 507 W.A.C. 75; 2010 MBCA 115, refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Hung et al. (1990), 113 A......
  • LLS America LLC (Trustee of) v. Dill, 2017 BCSC 469
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 23, 2017
    ...in the sense that they could be revived status quo ante and could, pending restoration, be sued: see, e.g., Saini v. Grand Forks (City), 2012 BCSC 320 at paras. 23-24. Accordingly, he says that the Consolidation Order properly included [71]        ......
  • R. v. MacIsaac (R.H.M.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2548 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 18, 2014
    ...in this case, it does have factual similarities to this case. [34] Crown also relies on R. v. Wilson , 2008 ONCA 510 and R. v. Nilsson , 2012 BCSC 320 which was affirmed at 2012 BCCA 498. [35] Wilson , was significantly more serious than the present case and is of limited value. [36] In Nil......
  • R. v. Gagnon,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 16, 2021
    ...to kill her, suggests an escalation of his violent behaviour. [41] As was set out at para. 43 of the reasons at trial in R. v. Nilsson, 2012 BCSC 320: [43] Robberies are an intolerable invasion of an individual’s sense of security and often result in ongoing fear and anxiety suffered by vic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT