R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.), 2005 BCSC 1484
Judge | MacKenzie, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Case Date | October 17, 2007 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | 2005 BCSC 1484;[2005] B.C.T.C. 1484 (SC) |
R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 1484 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. DE.026
Regina v. Lloyd Allan Ferris, Joseph Elwood Roger Lepage and David James Oliynyk
(65537; 2005 BCSC 1484)
Indexed As: R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.) et al.
British Columbia Supreme Court
New Westminster
MacKenzie, J.
October 17, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Editor's Note: certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.
Criminal Law - Topic 4349
Procedure - Jury - Evidence - Tapes and transcripts of intercepted communications - See paragraphs 1 to 25.
Criminal Law - Topic 5310.2
Evidence and witnesses - Admissibility of private communications - Practice - Admission of admissible interceptions - Editing transcripts - See paragraphs 1 to 25.
Counsel:
L. LeClair, M. Devlin and N. Namazi, for the Crown;
J.W. Conroy, Q.C., for the defendant, David James Oliynyk;
P. Benning, for the defendant, Joseph Elwood Roger Lepage;
D. Silverman, for the defendant, Lloyd Allan Ferris.
This application was heard before MacKenzie, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on October 17, 2007.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Duong, 2019 BCCA 299
...finder of fact in understanding the audio recordings and in their fact-finding function more generally: R. v. Oliynyk, LePage and Ferris, 2005 BCSC 1484 at para. 15. [44] The Crown points out that the audio recordings were marked as an exhibit and played in open court both during the trial ......
-
R. v. Aldaba (J.M.R.) et al., (2014) 608 A.R. 93 (QB)
...for understanding the words spoken on the call." - See paragraph 11. Cases Noticed: R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 1484; 2005 BCSC 1484, appld. [para. Dawn MacDonald and Deborah Alford, for the Crown; Simon Renouf, Q.C., Julia Renouf and Adam Badari, for Steven Daniel Whipple; C......
-
R. v. Duong, 2019 BCCA 299
...finder of fact in understanding the audio recordings and in their fact-finding function more generally: R. v. Oliynyk, LePage and Ferris, 2005 BCSC 1484 at para. 15. [44] The Crown points out that the audio recordings were marked as an exhibit and played in open court both during the trial ......
-
R. v. Aldaba (J.M.R.) et al., (2014) 608 A.R. 93 (QB)
...for understanding the words spoken on the call." - See paragraph 11. Cases Noticed: R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 1484; 2005 BCSC 1484, appld. [para. Dawn MacDonald and Deborah Alford, for the Crown; Simon Renouf, Q.C., Julia Renouf and Adam Badari, for Steven Daniel Whipple; C......