R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.), 2005 BCSC 1484

JudgeMacKenzie, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateOctober 17, 2007
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2005 BCSC 1484;[2005] B.C.T.C. 1484 (SC)

R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 1484 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. DE.026

Regina v. Lloyd Allan Ferris, Joseph Elwood Roger Lepage and David James Oliynyk

(65537; 2005 BCSC 1484)

Indexed As: R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.) et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

New Westminster

MacKenzie, J.

October 17, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Editor's Note: certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Criminal Law - Topic 4349

Procedure - Jury - Evidence - Tapes and transcripts of intercepted communications - See paragraphs 1 to 25.

Criminal Law - Topic 5310.2

Evidence and witnesses - Admissibility of private communications - Practice - Admission of admissible interceptions - Editing transcripts - See paragraphs 1 to 25.

Counsel:

L. LeClair, M. Devlin and N. Namazi, for the Crown;

J.W. Conroy, Q.C., for the defendant, David James Oliynyk;

P. Benning, for the defendant, Joseph Elwood Roger Lepage;

D. Silverman, for the defendant, Lloyd Allan Ferris.

This application was heard before MacKenzie, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on October 17, 2007.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Duong, 2019 BCCA 299
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 20, 2019
    ...finder of fact in understanding the audio recordings and in their fact-finding function more generally: R. v. Oliynyk, LePage and Ferris, 2005 BCSC 1484 at para. 15. [44] The Crown points out that the audio recordings were marked as an exhibit and played in open court both during the trial ......
  • R. v. Aldaba (J.M.R.) et al., (2014) 608 A.R. 93 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 8, 2014
    ...for understanding the words spoken on the call." - See paragraph 11. Cases Noticed: R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 1484; 2005 BCSC 1484, appld. [para. Dawn MacDonald and Deborah Alford, for the Crown; Simon Renouf, Q.C., Julia Renouf and Adam Badari, for Steven Daniel Whipple; C......
2 cases
  • R. v. Duong, 2019 BCCA 299
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 20, 2019
    ...finder of fact in understanding the audio recordings and in their fact-finding function more generally: R. v. Oliynyk, LePage and Ferris, 2005 BCSC 1484 at para. 15. [44] The Crown points out that the audio recordings were marked as an exhibit and played in open court both during the trial ......
  • R. v. Aldaba (J.M.R.) et al., (2014) 608 A.R. 93 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 8, 2014
    ...for understanding the words spoken on the call." - See paragraph 11. Cases Noticed: R. v. Oliynyk (D.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 1484; 2005 BCSC 1484, appld. [para. Dawn MacDonald and Deborah Alford, for the Crown; Simon Renouf, Q.C., Julia Renouf and Adam Badari, for Steven Daniel Whipple; C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT