R. v. Osinde,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Saunders,The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCCA 124 |
| Docket Number | CA45911 |
| Citation | 2021 BCCA 124 |
| Date | 29 March 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. M.P.H.,
...of the judgment but in the reasoning process that led to a conviction: R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 at para. 2. See also R. v. Osinde, 2021 BCCA 124 at paras. [83] In this case, Mr. H contends the judge was mistaken about the complainant’s testimony t......
-
R v Morgan,
...a purported misapprehension of the evidence attracts a stringent standard of review: R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 at para. 2; R. v. Osinde, 2021 BCCA 124 at paras. 17–20. A misapprehension of the evidence includes a failure to consider evidence relevant to a material issue, a mistake as......
-
Tian v Yu,
...judge failed to consider the possibility that other persons may have been responsible for authoring the statements. 39 In R. v. Osinde, 2021 BCCA 124, this Court comprehensively reviewed the law related to the misapprehension of evidence. I can do no better than quote the relevant passages ......
3 cases
-
R v Morgan,
...a purported misapprehension of the evidence attracts a stringent standard of review: R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 at para. 2; R. v. Osinde, 2021 BCCA 124 at paras. 17–20. A misapprehension of the evidence includes a failure to consider evidence relevant to a material issue, a mistake as......
-
R. v. M.P.H.,
...of the judgment but in the reasoning process that led to a conviction: R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 at para. 2. See also R. v. Osinde, 2021 BCCA 124 at paras. [83] In this case, Mr. H contends the judge was mistaken about the complainant’s testimony t......
-
Tian v Yu,
...judge failed to consider the possibility that other persons may have been responsible for authoring the statements. 39 In R. v. Osinde, 2021 BCCA 124, this Court comprehensively reviewed the law related to the misapprehension of evidence. I can do no better than quote the relevant passages ......