R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeDI LUCA J.
Citation2019 ONSC 2514
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Docket NumberCR-17-002740
Date24 April 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • R. v. Musara,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 30 Mayo 2022
    ...testing. [230]       Ontario Superior Court justices have come to the same conclusion.  In R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514, at para. 129, Di Luca J. found no s. 8 breach where, after seizure, phones were removed from an evidence locker, a forensic image was cre......
  • R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 3725
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Junio 2019
    ...this regard, I adopt the review of the applicable legal principles found in my earlier Garofoli Ruling in this case, which is reported at 2019 ONSC 2514. [47] The production order ITO contains a summary of the entire police investigation in relation to the fentanyl trafficking scheme that D......
  • R. v. Robinson,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 31 Marzo 2021
    ...of the phone from the data contained therein. [23] Although the applicants rely on prior case law from this court, such as R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514, and R. v. D’Souza, 2016 ONSC 5855, it is apparent that the court in those cases found a second report was required on the basis of a Crown c......
  • Peel Regional Police Service v. Latanya Grant,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 14 Enero 2022
    ...an Assistance Order directed at a software provider who would be able to gain access to Ms. Grant’s cell phone: R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514 at para. 142-144; R. v. Millard, 2016 ONSC [53]            Ms. Grant offers no authority i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • R. v. Musara,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 30 Mayo 2022
    ...testing. [230]       Ontario Superior Court justices have come to the same conclusion.  In R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514, at para. 129, Di Luca J. found no s. 8 breach where, after seizure, phones were removed from an evidence locker, a forensic image was cre......
  • R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 3725
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Junio 2019
    ...this regard, I adopt the review of the applicable legal principles found in my earlier Garofoli Ruling in this case, which is reported at 2019 ONSC 2514. [47] The production order ITO contains a summary of the entire police investigation in relation to the fentanyl trafficking scheme that D......
  • R. v. Robinson,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 31 Marzo 2021
    ...of the phone from the data contained therein. [23] Although the applicants rely on prior case law from this court, such as R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514, and R. v. D’Souza, 2016 ONSC 5855, it is apparent that the court in those cases found a second report was required on the basis of a Crown c......
  • Peel Regional Police Service v. Latanya Grant,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 14 Enero 2022
    ...an Assistance Order directed at a software provider who would be able to gain access to Ms. Grant’s cell phone: R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514 at para. 142-144; R. v. Millard, 2016 ONSC [53]            Ms. Grant offers no authority i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT