R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeMartin J.
Docket NumberCR 17-01-35883
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
Date02 July 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Brass, 2021 MBQB 272
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 17, 2021
    ...Defence provided R. v. St. Paul, [2021] M.J. No. 87; R. v. Schuff, 2021 MBCA 54; Okemow; R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102 and R. v. Nash, 2009 NBCA [32]                        The 1......
  • R. v. Watt,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 25, 2022
    ...v. Chartrand, unreported, MBQB, October 18, 2021; R. v. Moar, 2021 MBQB 203 (CanLII); R. v. Schuff, 2021 MBCA 54 (CanLII); R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102 (CanLII); R. v. Ryle, 2018 MBQB 32 (CanLII); R. v. Mohamed, 2017 MBQB 64 (CanLII); R. v. Nelson, 2009 MBCA 76 (CanLII)).  For example, ......
  • R. v. Saunders,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • September 9, 2022
    ...and proper sentence.  Unusual circumstances do not have to exist to extend the parole ineligibility period.  See R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102 at paras. 20–21, 31, 36; R. v. Harper, 2019 MBQB 82 at paras. 1–3; R. v. Assi, 2021 MBQB 217 at paras. 18–20; R. v. Boy......
  • R. v. Marjanovic, 2019 MBQB 183
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 18, 2019
    ...PRECEDENTS [22] As to sentencing generally for parole ineligibility on second degree murder, I repeat comments I made in R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102, [2019] M.J. No. 197. Specifically, that the evolution of jurisprudence for setting the appropriate period of parole ineligibility for second ......
4 cases
  • R. v. Brass, 2021 MBQB 272
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 17, 2021
    ...Defence provided R. v. St. Paul, [2021] M.J. No. 87; R. v. Schuff, 2021 MBCA 54; Okemow; R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102 and R. v. Nash, 2009 NBCA [32]                        The 1......
  • R. v. Watt,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 25, 2022
    ...v. Chartrand, unreported, MBQB, October 18, 2021; R. v. Moar, 2021 MBQB 203 (CanLII); R. v. Schuff, 2021 MBCA 54 (CanLII); R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102 (CanLII); R. v. Ryle, 2018 MBQB 32 (CanLII); R. v. Mohamed, 2017 MBQB 64 (CanLII); R. v. Nelson, 2009 MBCA 76 (CanLII)).  For example, ......
  • R. v. Saunders,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • September 9, 2022
    ...and proper sentence.  Unusual circumstances do not have to exist to extend the parole ineligibility period.  See R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102 at paras. 20–21, 31, 36; R. v. Harper, 2019 MBQB 82 at paras. 1–3; R. v. Assi, 2021 MBQB 217 at paras. 18–20; R. v. Boy......
  • R. v. Marjanovic, 2019 MBQB 183
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 18, 2019
    ...PRECEDENTS [22] As to sentencing generally for parole ineligibility on second degree murder, I repeat comments I made in R. v. Overby, 2019 MBQB 102, [2019] M.J. No. 197. Specifically, that the evolution of jurisprudence for setting the appropriate period of parole ineligibility for second ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT