R. v. P.M.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | SPIES J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 3325 |
| Docket Number | CR- 19-7-125 |
| Date | 15 July 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
R. v. A.J.K.
...and what I will refer to as the “non-Smith range” has understandably caused significant expressions of concern: see e.g., R. v. P.M., 2020 ONSC 3325, at paras. 94-105, aff’d 2022 ONCA 408; R. v. O.K.S., 2019 ONCJ 482, at n. 8; R. v. W.K., 2021 ONSC 3473, at paras. 50-54. The unease arises f......
-
R. v. Blake
...violence is two to four years’ imprisonment. Since then however, I have come to a somewhat different conclusion. In R. v. P.M., 2020 ONSC 3325, I found that R. v. Bradley, 2008 ONCA 179, 234 O.A.C. 363 has precedential value even though it was an endorsement from the Court of Appeal and tha......
-
R. v. O’Dea
...absence, it also supplied case law where judges proceeded with sentencing despite an offender having absconded: R. v. P.M., 2020 ONSC 3325, at para. 13; R. v. Montague, 2021 ONSC 2966, at para. 3; R. v. Maxwell, 2013 ONSC 5088, at paras. In sum, given the express provisions of the Criminal ......
-
R. v. Niyongabo
...which are not present in this case. [47] In advance of the hearing I provided counsel with my recent decision in R. v. P. M., 2020 ONSC 3325, where I found that R. v. Bradley, 2008 ONCA 179, 234 O.A.C. 363 has precedential value even though it was an endorsement from the Court of Appeal and......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
R. v. A.J.K.
...and what I will refer to as the “non-Smith range” has understandably caused significant expressions of concern: see e.g., R. v. P.M., 2020 ONSC 3325, at paras. 94-105, aff’d 2022 ONCA 408; R. v. O.K.S., 2019 ONCJ 482, at n. 8; R. v. W.K., 2021 ONSC 3473, at paras. 50-54. The unease arises f......
-
R. v. Blake
...violence is two to four years’ imprisonment. Since then however, I have come to a somewhat different conclusion. In R. v. P.M., 2020 ONSC 3325, I found that R. v. Bradley, 2008 ONCA 179, 234 O.A.C. 363 has precedential value even though it was an endorsement from the Court of Appeal and tha......
-
R. v. O’Dea
...absence, it also supplied case law where judges proceeded with sentencing despite an offender having absconded: R. v. P.M., 2020 ONSC 3325, at para. 13; R. v. Montague, 2021 ONSC 2966, at para. 3; R. v. Maxwell, 2013 ONSC 5088, at paras. In sum, given the express provisions of the Criminal ......
-
R. v. Niyongabo
...which are not present in this case. [47] In advance of the hearing I provided counsel with my recent decision in R. v. P. M., 2020 ONSC 3325, where I found that R. v. Bradley, 2008 ONCA 179, 234 O.A.C. 363 has precedential value even though it was an endorsement from the Court of Appeal and......
Get Started for Free