R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Saunders,The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Mr. Justice Hunter |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 351 |
| Date | 18 October 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA46202 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
R. v. Aguilera Jimenez, 2020 YKCA 5
...deterrent and denunciatory in effect so this Court increased it and added a curfew. [54] As Justice Harris explained in R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351, the term “exceptional circumstances” is simply a shorthand means of describing the kinds of circumstances which justify going outside a normal ......
-
R v Bertacco,
...justify departure from a conventional sentencing range in order to craft a proportionate sentence. As this Court noted in R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351 at para. 36, characterizing an offender’s circumstances as exceptional “is simply a shorthand means of identifying the kind of personal circum......
-
R. v. Price,
...(1996), 113 C.C.C. (3d) 216, 33 W.C.B. (2d) 378 (B.C.C.A.); R. v. Bayani (2003), 173 O.A.C. 36, 58 W.C.B. (2d) 83 (C.A.); R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351; R. v. Chalifoux (1995), 174 A.R. 348, 29 W.C.B. (2d) 81 (C.A); R. v. Roberts (1992), 15 W.C.B. (2d) 380, 10 B.C.A.C. 158 (C.A.); R. v. Blackh......
-
R v Armstrong,
...That is not the role of this Court, and does not accord with the standard of deference owed to sentencing judges: see R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351 at para. 27 I would not accede to this ground of appeal. (2) Did the judge err in imposing a disparate and disproportionate sentence? 28 Mr. Armst......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
R. v. Aguilera Jimenez, 2020 YKCA 5
...deterrent and denunciatory in effect so this Court increased it and added a curfew. [54] As Justice Harris explained in R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351, the term “exceptional circumstances” is simply a shorthand means of describing the kinds of circumstances which justify going outside a normal ......
-
R v Bertacco,
...justify departure from a conventional sentencing range in order to craft a proportionate sentence. As this Court noted in R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351 at para. 36, characterizing an offender’s circumstances as exceptional “is simply a shorthand means of identifying the kind of personal circum......
-
R. v. Price,
...(1996), 113 C.C.C. (3d) 216, 33 W.C.B. (2d) 378 (B.C.C.A.); R. v. Bayani (2003), 173 O.A.C. 36, 58 W.C.B. (2d) 83 (C.A.); R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351; R. v. Chalifoux (1995), 174 A.R. 348, 29 W.C.B. (2d) 81 (C.A); R. v. Roberts (1992), 15 W.C.B. (2d) 380, 10 B.C.A.C. 158 (C.A.); R. v. Blackh......
-
R v Armstrong,
...That is not the role of this Court, and does not accord with the standard of deference owed to sentencing judges: see R. v. Padda, 2019 BCCA 351 at para. 27 I would not accede to this ground of appeal. (2) Did the judge err in imposing a disparate and disproportionate sentence? 28 Mr. Armst......
Request a trial to view additional results