R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Jackson, Whitmore and Ryan-Froslie JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2017 SKCA 101 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACR2985 |
| Date | 01 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v Aalbers,
...[31] Turning to the appellate Saskatchewan jurisprudence, in R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101, [2018] 3 WWR 7, this Court did not rule out the use of provocation as a mitigating factor. However, the Court declined to accept the argum......
-
R v Wolfe,
...itself constitute a reviewable error” (Lacasse at para 52; R v Lloyd, 2016 SCC 13 at para 52, [2016] 1 SCR 130; R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101 at paras 43-44, [2018] 3 WWR 7). [35] Mr. Wolfe did not seriously argue that his ......
-
R v Johnson,
...the trial judge imposed is demonstrably unfit. [52] This Court addressed the use of sentence ranges post‑Lacasse in R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101, [2018] 3 WWR 7. There, Jackson J.A. [44] In summary, the failure to adhere to a sentencing range does not, on its own, constitute an error in p......
-
R v Bear,
...Crown points to a range of 12 to 36 months for repeat violent offenders who commit serious, second-level assaults: e.g., R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101, [2018] 3 WWR 7; R v Meyers, 2012 SKCA 98, 399 Sask R 261; R v Oochoo, 2004 SKCA (SentDig) 40; and R v Sunshine, 2016 SKCA 104, 484 Sask R ......
4 cases
-
R v Aalbers,
...[31] Turning to the appellate Saskatchewan jurisprudence, in R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101, [2018] 3 WWR 7, this Court did not rule out the use of provocation as a mitigating factor. However, the Court declined to accept the argum......
-
R v Wolfe,
...itself constitute a reviewable error” (Lacasse at para 52; R v Lloyd, 2016 SCC 13 at para 52, [2016] 1 SCR 130; R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101 at paras 43-44, [2018] 3 WWR 7). [35] Mr. Wolfe did not seriously argue that his ......
-
R v Johnson,
...the trial judge imposed is demonstrably unfit. [52] This Court addressed the use of sentence ranges post‑Lacasse in R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101, [2018] 3 WWR 7. There, Jackson J.A. [44] In summary, the failure to adhere to a sentencing range does not, on its own, constitute an error in p......
-
R v Bear,
...Crown points to a range of 12 to 36 months for repeat violent offenders who commit serious, second-level assaults: e.g., R v Parchomchuk, 2017 SKCA 101, [2018] 3 WWR 7; R v Meyers, 2012 SKCA 98, 399 Sask R 261; R v Oochoo, 2004 SKCA (SentDig) 40; and R v Sunshine, 2016 SKCA 104, 484 Sask R ......