R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Citation | 2020 NUCA 2 |
| Date | 09 April 2020 |
| Court | Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 03-19-001 CAP |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 practice notes
-
R v Kuliktana, 2020 NUCA 7
...to be reinforced. The appellant’s counsel also mentions R v Mathewsie, 2016 NUCA 5, [2016] Nu J 28 (QL). To this might be added R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2, [2020] Nu J No. 16 (QL). These cases are discussed [7] The appellant’s right of appeal comes to me pursuant to s 812(2) of the Criminal Code......
-
R v Coreman,
...SCC 48, [2015] 3 SCR 321. More fundamentally, an uneven scrutiny argument is not a proxy for reassessing credibility generally: R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2 at para 42, citing Wanihadie at para 43; R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at paras 88-89, per Leurer JA (in dissent but not on this point). An appeal......
-
R v Strathdee, 2020 ABCA 306
...SCC 48, [2015] 3 SCR 321. More fundamentally, an uneven scrutiny argument is not a proxy for reassessing credibility generally: R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2 at para 42, citing Wanihadie at para 43; R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at paras 88‑89, per Leurer JA (in dissent but not on this point). An appeal......
-
R. v. Nahanee,
...added.] [48] A similar result was obtained in Gabriel c. R., 2015 QCCA 1391, which cited both R. v. R.R.B. and Keough. [49] In R v. Parr, 2020 NUCA 2, the majority of the Nunavut Court of Appeal took a similar approach, concluding that a sentencing judge’s failure to advise counsel of his i......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
-
R v Kuliktana, 2020 NUCA 7
...to be reinforced. The appellant’s counsel also mentions R v Mathewsie, 2016 NUCA 5, [2016] Nu J 28 (QL). To this might be added R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2, [2020] Nu J No. 16 (QL). These cases are discussed [7] The appellant’s right of appeal comes to me pursuant to s 812(2) of the Criminal Code......
-
R v Coreman,
...SCC 48, [2015] 3 SCR 321. More fundamentally, an uneven scrutiny argument is not a proxy for reassessing credibility generally: R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2 at para 42, citing Wanihadie at para 43; R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at paras 88-89, per Leurer JA (in dissent but not on this point). An appeal......
-
R v Strathdee, 2020 ABCA 306
...SCC 48, [2015] 3 SCR 321. More fundamentally, an uneven scrutiny argument is not a proxy for reassessing credibility generally: R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2 at para 42, citing Wanihadie at para 43; R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at paras 88‑89, per Leurer JA (in dissent but not on this point). An appeal......
-
R. v. Nahanee,
...added.] [48] A similar result was obtained in Gabriel c. R., 2015 QCCA 1391, which cited both R. v. R.R.B. and Keough. [49] In R v. Parr, 2020 NUCA 2, the majority of the Nunavut Court of Appeal took a similar approach, concluding that a sentencing judge’s failure to advise counsel of his i......
Request a trial to view additional results