R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2
| Docket Number | 03-19-001 CAP |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter; The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio; The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nunavaut |
| Case Date | April 09, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Citations | 2020 NUCA 2 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R. v. Nahanee, 2021 BCCA 13
...added.] [48] A similar result was obtained in Gabriel c. R., 2015 QCCA 1391, which cited both R. v. R.R.B. and Keough. [49] In R v. Parr, 2020 NUCA 2, the majority of the Nunavut Court of Appeal took a similar approach, concluding that a sentencing judge’s failure to advise counsel of his i......
-
R v Kritaqliluk, 2021 NUCA 4
...on “jumping” Crown submissions [15] Crown counsel and defence agree that the appropriate statement of law is set out in R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2, paras 54-55, 60. [16] The sentencing judge had “a duty to signal to counsel that [he] was having some difficulties with what was being......
-
R. v. Kolola, 2020 NUCJ 38
...1, s. 718.04. [52] R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 at para 108. [53] That is, a period of jail of two years less a day, served in Nunavut. [54] 2020 NUCA 2. [55] 2015 NUCA [56] Ibid at para 9. [67] The Crown submitted two cases from the Nunavut Court of Appeal. In R v Parr,[54]...
-
R v Strathdee, 2020 ABCA 306
...SCC 48, [2015] 3 SCR 321. More fundamentally, an uneven scrutiny argument is not a proxy for reassessing credibility generally: R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2 at para 42, citing Wanihadie at para 43; R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at paras 88‑89, per Leurer JA (in dissent but not on this point). An appeal......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R. v. Nahanee, 2021 BCCA 13
...added.] [48] A similar result was obtained in Gabriel c. R., 2015 QCCA 1391, which cited both R. v. R.R.B. and Keough. [49] In R v. Parr, 2020 NUCA 2, the majority of the Nunavut Court of Appeal took a similar approach, concluding that a sentencing judge’s failure to advise counsel of his i......
-
R v Kritaqliluk, 2021 NUCA 4
...on “jumping” Crown submissions [15] Crown counsel and defence agree that the appropriate statement of law is set out in R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2, paras 54-55, 60. [16] The sentencing judge had “a duty to signal to counsel that [he] was having some difficulties with what was being......
-
R. v. Kolola, 2020 NUCJ 38
...1, s. 718.04. [52] R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 at para 108. [53] That is, a period of jail of two years less a day, served in Nunavut. [54] 2020 NUCA 2. [55] 2015 NUCA [56] Ibid at para 9. [67] The Crown submitted two cases from the Nunavut Court of Appeal. In R v Parr,[54]...
-
R v Strathdee, 2020 ABCA 306
...SCC 48, [2015] 3 SCR 321. More fundamentally, an uneven scrutiny argument is not a proxy for reassessing credibility generally: R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2 at para 42, citing Wanihadie at para 43; R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at paras 88‑89, per Leurer JA (in dissent but not on this point). An appeal......
Request a trial to view additional results