R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Blok |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 360 |
| Date | 01 March 2019 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 27693 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v. Bakhsheshi,
...R. v. Wylie, 2020 BCPC 17); plugged in to charge (see R. v. Ali, 2019 BCSC 2268); or wedged into the passenger seat (see R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360). [12] In R. v. Sangret, 2019 BCSC 2131 [Sangret], this Court discussed the definition of use in ......
-
R. v. Sangha, 2020 BCSC 466
...of distraction. In this sense, the offence can be said to require an “accompanying act” on the part of the driver: see R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360: para. 6. As defined in the MVA, that act may be as simple as holding the device in a manner that enables further use. Merely driving within ......
-
R. v. Rajani, 2020 BCSC 779
...of distraction. In this sense, the offence can be said to require an “accompanying act” on the part of the driver: see R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360: para. 6. As defined in the MVA, that act may be as simple as holding the device in a manner that enables further use. Merely driving within ......
-
R. v. Ali, 2019 BCSC 2268
...to the mere position of a phone in the charger being insufficient to be an offence under that section. The case is R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360. [12] If the judgment ended after para. 15, that is immediately before the offending paragraph th......
4 cases
-
R v. Bakhsheshi,
...R. v. Wylie, 2020 BCPC 17); plugged in to charge (see R. v. Ali, 2019 BCSC 2268); or wedged into the passenger seat (see R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360). [12] In R. v. Sangret, 2019 BCSC 2131 [Sangret], this Court discussed the definition of use in ......
-
R. v. Sangha, 2020 BCSC 466
...of distraction. In this sense, the offence can be said to require an “accompanying act” on the part of the driver: see R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360: para. 6. As defined in the MVA, that act may be as simple as holding the device in a manner that enables further use. Merely driving within ......
-
R. v. Rajani, 2020 BCSC 779
...of distraction. In this sense, the offence can be said to require an “accompanying act” on the part of the driver: see R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360: para. 6. As defined in the MVA, that act may be as simple as holding the device in a manner that enables further use. Merely driving within ......
-
R. v. Ali, 2019 BCSC 2268
...to the mere position of a phone in the charger being insufficient to be an offence under that section. The case is R. v. Partridge, 2019 BCSC 360. [12] If the judgment ended after para. 15, that is immediately before the offending paragraph th......