R v Pawlivsky, 2020 SKCA 75
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Whitmore, Leurer and Tholl JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 75 |
| Docket Number | CACR3268 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 25 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R v Santos,
...is an adequate evidentiary record and the trial judge has made the necessary findings of fact, as Leurer J.A. explained in R v Pawlivsky, 2020 SKCA 75: [25] … [T]he basic question the appeal court must ask itself is whether it is positioned to conduct its......
-
R. v. Dickson,
...make the necessary findings to resolve the contest, an appellate court is unlikely to be in a position to do so, citing R. v. Pawliivsky, 2020 SKCA 75 at para. 25 and R. v. Dudhi, 2019 ONCA 665, at para. 88. [126] Mr. Meehan reiterated his arguments that there ......
-
BINKLEY v. R.,
...In R v Pawlivsky, 2020 SKCA 75 [Pawlivsky], the Court considered when it would be appropriate for an appellate Court to conduct a Grant analysis where no such analysis was performed by the trial judge. At paragraph 25 of the decision, the Court notes that an appeal court will be in the......
3 cases
-
R v Santos,
...is an adequate evidentiary record and the trial judge has made the necessary findings of fact, as Leurer J.A. explained in R v Pawlivsky, 2020 SKCA 75: [25] … [T]he basic question the appeal court must ask itself is whether it is positioned to conduct its......
-
R. v. Dickson,
...make the necessary findings to resolve the contest, an appellate court is unlikely to be in a position to do so, citing R. v. Pawliivsky, 2020 SKCA 75 at para. 25 and R. v. Dudhi, 2019 ONCA 665, at para. 88. [126] Mr. Meehan reiterated his arguments that there ......
-
BINKLEY v. R.,
...In R v Pawlivsky, 2020 SKCA 75 [Pawlivsky], the Court considered when it would be appropriate for an appellate Court to conduct a Grant analysis where no such analysis was performed by the trial judge. At paragraph 25 of the decision, the Court notes that an appeal court will be in the......