R. v. PEEQUAQUAT, 2020 SKQB 2
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | TOCHOR J. |
| Citation | 2020 SKQB 2 |
| Date | 07 January 2020 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CRM 123 of 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. COLTER BURTNICK, 2020 SKQB 193
...R v Drysdale, 2013 SKQB 392, 432 Sask R 46; R v Porter, 2015 SKQB 181, 478 Sask R 117; R v Pelletier, 2018 SKQB 106; and R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2. [11] Respecting each ground of appeal, I will follow the analysis set out in Farrah, stated more simply as follows: 1. Did the trial judge co......
-
R. v. HANSEN,
...this question, the Crown, correctly in my view, commended the Court’s attention to the recent observation of Tochor J. in R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2. In that judgment, my learned colleague referenced two helpful appellate authorities from the Saskatchewan and Manitoba Courts of Appeal. Spe......
-
R. v. Anderson,
...a reasonable expectation of privacy was outlined in my decision of R v Peequaquat, 2018 SKPC 16 at paras 17-20, 410 CRR (2d) 183; affirmed 2020 SKQB 2, 55 MVR (7th) 21 [17] There is no definitive list of factors that must be considered in assessing the “......
3 cases
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. COLTER BURTNICK, 2020 SKQB 193
...R v Drysdale, 2013 SKQB 392, 432 Sask R 46; R v Porter, 2015 SKQB 181, 478 Sask R 117; R v Pelletier, 2018 SKQB 106; and R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2. [11] Respecting each ground of appeal, I will follow the analysis set out in Farrah, stated more simply as follows: 1. Did the trial judge co......
-
R. v. HANSEN,
...this question, the Crown, correctly in my view, commended the Court’s attention to the recent observation of Tochor J. in R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2. In that judgment, my learned colleague referenced two helpful appellate authorities from the Saskatchewan and Manitoba Courts of Appeal. Spe......
-
R. v. Anderson,
...a reasonable expectation of privacy was outlined in my decision of R v Peequaquat, 2018 SKPC 16 at paras 17-20, 410 CRR (2d) 183; affirmed 2020 SKQB 2, 55 MVR (7th) 21 [17] There is no definitive list of factors that must be considered in assessing the “......