R. v. PEEQUAQUAT,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | TOCHOR J. |
| Citation | 2020 SKQB 2 |
| Date | 07 January 2020 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CRM 123 of 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
R v Singer,
...Mr. Moyles's s. 8 Charter right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure. 32 Rogers was also applied in R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2, 55 MVR (7th) 21 [ Peequaquat QB]. In that case, police officers had received a report of a possible impaired driver and attended at the address of ......
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. COLTER BURTNICK,
...R v Drysdale, 2013 SKQB 392, 432 Sask R 46; R v Porter, 2015 SKQB 181, 478 Sask R 117; R v Pelletier, 2018 SKQB 106; and R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2. [11] Respecting each ground of appeal, I will follow the analysis set out in Farrah, stated more simply as follows: 1. Did the trial judge co......
-
R. v. HANSEN,
...this question, the Crown, correctly in my view, commended the Court’s attention to the recent observation of Tochor J. in R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2. In that judgment, my learned colleague referenced two helpful appellate authorities from the Saskatchewan and Manitoba Courts of Appeal. Spe......
-
R. v. Anderson,
...a reasonable expectation of privacy was outlined in my decision of R v Peequaquat, 2018 SKPC 16 at paras 17-20, 410 CRR (2d) 183; affirmed 2020 SKQB 2, 55 MVR (7th) 21 [17] There is no definitive list of factors that must be considered in assessing the “......
4 cases
-
R v Singer,
...Mr. Moyles's s. 8 Charter right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure. 32 Rogers was also applied in R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2, 55 MVR (7th) 21 [ Peequaquat QB]. In that case, police officers had received a report of a possible impaired driver and attended at the address of ......
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. COLTER BURTNICK,
...R v Drysdale, 2013 SKQB 392, 432 Sask R 46; R v Porter, 2015 SKQB 181, 478 Sask R 117; R v Pelletier, 2018 SKQB 106; and R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2. [11] Respecting each ground of appeal, I will follow the analysis set out in Farrah, stated more simply as follows: 1. Did the trial judge co......
-
R. v. HANSEN,
...this question, the Crown, correctly in my view, commended the Court’s attention to the recent observation of Tochor J. in R v Peequaquat, 2020 SKQB 2. In that judgment, my learned colleague referenced two helpful appellate authorities from the Saskatchewan and Manitoba Courts of Appeal. Spe......
-
R. v. Anderson,
...a reasonable expectation of privacy was outlined in my decision of R v Peequaquat, 2018 SKPC 16 at paras 17-20, 410 CRR (2d) 183; affirmed 2020 SKQB 2, 55 MVR (7th) 21 [17] There is no definitive list of factors that must be considered in assessing the “......