R. v. Pereira (L.S.) et al., 2007 BCSC 1533

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeRomilly, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,EVIDENCE
Citation2007 BCSC 1533,[2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. I25
Date16 October 2007
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • R. v. Violette (J.J.) et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. H17
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2008
    ...comprises the following: (a) Copies of intercepts from Plante's lines, which the Court ordered be disclosed on September 28, 2007 (2007 BCSC 1533). (b) Any other intercepts that have yet to be disclosed as a result of the September 28, 2007 order. Counsel for Potts submit that to date,......
  • R. v. Latimer,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 20, 2020
    ...of mistake or miscommunication. As the cases on disclosure make clear, the disclosure process will not be perfect:  R. v. Pereira, 2007 BCSC 1533 at para. 63, citing R. v. O'Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411 at paras. 192–194; R. v. Russell, 2012 BCSC 373 [Russell] at p......
  • R. v. Beckett (P.E.E.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 731
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 17, 2014
    ..., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326; R. v. Oszenaris , 2008 NLCA 53 (leave to appeal refused); R. v. Therrein , 2005 BCSC 592; R. v. Pereira , 2007 BCSC 1533; R. v. Greer , 2006 BCSC 1894; R. v. Radwanski , [2006] O.J. No. 5250; R. v. Liew , 2012 ONSC 1826; R. v. Dunn (2009), 251 C.C.C. (3d) 384; R. v. L......
  • R. v. Latimer,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 18, 2020
    ...of whether to challenge the withheld information. [108]     The Crown contends that the decision in R. v. Pereira, 2007 BCSC 1533 at para. 58, supports its position that the withheld email spreadsheets are sufficient and that more particularized requests by the defence i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • R. v. Violette (J.J.) et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. H17
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2008
    ...comprises the following: (a) Copies of intercepts from Plante's lines, which the Court ordered be disclosed on September 28, 2007 (2007 BCSC 1533). (b) Any other intercepts that have yet to be disclosed as a result of the September 28, 2007 order. Counsel for Potts submit that to date,......
  • R. v. Latimer,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 20, 2020
    ...of mistake or miscommunication. As the cases on disclosure make clear, the disclosure process will not be perfect:  R. v. Pereira, 2007 BCSC 1533 at para. 63, citing R. v. O'Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411 at paras. 192–194; R. v. Russell, 2012 BCSC 373 [Russell] at p......
  • R. v. Beckett (P.E.E.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 731
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 17, 2014
    ..., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326; R. v. Oszenaris , 2008 NLCA 53 (leave to appeal refused); R. v. Therrein , 2005 BCSC 592; R. v. Pereira , 2007 BCSC 1533; R. v. Greer , 2006 BCSC 1894; R. v. Radwanski , [2006] O.J. No. 5250; R. v. Liew , 2012 ONSC 1826; R. v. Dunn (2009), 251 C.C.C. (3d) 384; R. v. L......
  • R. v. Latimer,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 18, 2020
    ...of whether to challenge the withheld information. [108]     The Crown contends that the decision in R. v. Pereira, 2007 BCSC 1533 at para. 58, supports its position that the withheld email spreadsheets are sufficient and that more particularized requests by the defence i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT