R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | HILL |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS |
| Citation | 2016 ONSC 8110 |
| Date | 23 December 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Athwal, 2017 ONSC 96
...and ammunition and not for the longer menu of items in Const. Gales’ original draft of Appendix A. Governing Principles In R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110, at para. 69, I Section 487.1(1) of the Code permits a peace officer to apply for a telewarrant by facsimile transmission of “an informati......
-
R. v. Tucker, 2017 ONCJ 860
...p. 297, R. v. Ngyuen, supra, at para. 58, R. v. Araujo (2000), 149 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (S.C.C.) and R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110 at para. 64.20 The excision exercise requires that any unlawfully obtained evidence be removed from consideration in......
-
R. v. Vigneswaralingam, 2017 ONCJ 640
...Ontario Superior Court of Justice comprehensively summarized the relevant legal guidance on the core review function in R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110, at paragraph 64 [Persaud]: 64 In performing its narrow role of constitutional review of an ITO, various instructive guidelines have been app......
-
R. v. Evans, 2017 ONSC 3141
...its face, the establishment of urgency. It requires the establishment of “impracticability”. See R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110 at para. [45] Third, the “impracticability” standard is a low on......
4 cases
-
R. v. Athwal, 2017 ONSC 96
...and ammunition and not for the longer menu of items in Const. Gales’ original draft of Appendix A. Governing Principles In R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110, at para. 69, I Section 487.1(1) of the Code permits a peace officer to apply for a telewarrant by facsimile transmission of “an informati......
-
R. v. Tucker, 2017 ONCJ 860
...p. 297, R. v. Ngyuen, supra, at para. 58, R. v. Araujo (2000), 149 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (S.C.C.) and R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110 at para. 64.20 The excision exercise requires that any unlawfully obtained evidence be removed from consideration in......
-
R. v. Vigneswaralingam, 2017 ONCJ 640
...Ontario Superior Court of Justice comprehensively summarized the relevant legal guidance on the core review function in R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110, at paragraph 64 [Persaud]: 64 In performing its narrow role of constitutional review of an ITO, various instructive guidelines have been app......
-
R. v. Evans, 2017 ONSC 3141
...its face, the establishment of urgency. It requires the establishment of “impracticability”. See R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110 at para. [45] Third, the “impracticability” standard is a low on......