R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Saunders,The Honourable Mr. Justice Hunter,The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 374 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 21 October 2019 |
| Docket Number | CA45548 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. M.P.H.,
...R. v. D.C., 2012 SCC 48 at paras. 3 and 25–28; Roth at para. 73, citing MacIsaac at para. 46 and R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374 at [60] I do not agree with Mr. H that the judge engaged in speculative reasoning when she addressed the......
-
R. v. Tsang,
...v. Morrissey (1995), 22 O.R. (3d) 514 (Ont. C.A.) at 530–531; R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374 at paras. 20–21. In my view, that is what occurred here and it tainted the judge’s credibility [17] In Pastro,......
-
R. v. Fay,
...One last issue arises with respect to this aspect of the first ground of appeal. The appellant relied on R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374 which, in some respect, is factually similar to the present case. However, in Pilkington, Saunders J.A., for the court, concluded that the judge’s ......
-
R. v. D.G.A.,
...afforded to credibility findings made by trial judges, including R. v. Thla Ceu, 2018 BCCA 480 at para. 34 and R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374 at para. 20. [43] The Crown emphasizes that it can be difficult for trial judges to articulate their credibility findings with precision, and submit......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. M.P.H.,
...R. v. D.C., 2012 SCC 48 at paras. 3 and 25–28; Roth at para. 73, citing MacIsaac at para. 46 and R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374 at [60] I do not agree with Mr. H that the judge engaged in speculative reasoning when she addressed the......
-
R. v. Tsang,
...v. Morrissey (1995), 22 O.R. (3d) 514 (Ont. C.A.) at 530–531; R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374 at paras. 20–21. In my view, that is what occurred here and it tainted the judge’s credibility [17] In Pastro,......
-
R. v. Fay,
...One last issue arises with respect to this aspect of the first ground of appeal. The appellant relied on R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374 which, in some respect, is factually similar to the present case. However, in Pilkington, Saunders J.A., for the court, concluded that the judge’s ......
-
R. v. D.G.A.,
...afforded to credibility findings made by trial judges, including R. v. Thla Ceu, 2018 BCCA 480 at para. 34 and R. v. Pilkington, 2019 BCCA 374 at para. 20. [43] The Crown emphasizes that it can be difficult for trial judges to articulate their credibility findings with precision, and submit......
Request a trial to view additional results