R v PO, 2020 ABQB 542

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice S. N. Mandziuk
Citation2020 ABQB 542
Date06 September 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number181424706Q1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • R v PO,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 21, 2021
    ...admitted under the narrative as circumstantial evidence exception to the evidentiary rule against prior consistent statements: R v PO, 2020 ABQB 542. In that decision, I held (at paras 32-37): The circumstances in which the IMs were uttered put them squarely within the exception. Timing is ......
1 cases
  • R v PO,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 21, 2021
    ...admitted under the narrative as circumstantial evidence exception to the evidentiary rule against prior consistent statements: R v PO, 2020 ABQB 542. In that decision, I held (at paras 32-37): The circumstances in which the IMs were uttered put them squarely within the exception. Timing is ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT