R. v. Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeBennett,Savage,Butler
Citation2019 BCCA 96
Date18 March 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Docket NumberCA44845
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • R. v. MacKinnon,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 28, 2021
    ...2011 BCCA 140, 274 C.C.C. (3d) 474, at para. 25; R. v. Wong, 2006 CanLII 18516, 211 O.A.C. 201 (CA), at para. 13; R. v. Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96, 373 C.C.C. (3d) 433, at paras. 17-113; R. v. McPhee, 2018 ONCA 1016, 143 O.R. (3d) 763, at paras. [771]     I am satisfied beyo......
  • R v Richards, 2020 ABCA 63
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 10, 2020
    ...is “any hurt or injury that interferes in a substantial way with the integrity, health or well-being of the complainant”: R v Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96 at para 113, 373 CCC (3d) 433. See also R v McPhee, 2018 ONCA 1016, at paras 27-41, 368 CCC 3d 293 which regarded the ancient definition of ‘m......
  • R v Androsoff,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 29, 2023
    ...or causing bodily harm, or by choking, suffocating or strangling (s. 267), and aggravated assault (s. 268(1)) (see R v Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96 at paras 81–113, 373 CCC (3d) 433). [40]           A conviction for the offence of......
  • R v PO,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 21, 2021
    ...and as such would not qualify as bodily harm, and therefore, in my opinion, should also not qualify as a wound. [434] In R v Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96 at paras 84 and 113 where Bennett JA in a unanimous British Columbia Court of Appeal decision defines the term “wound” in the following way: a ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • R. v. MacKinnon,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 28, 2021
    ...2011 BCCA 140, 274 C.C.C. (3d) 474, at para. 25; R. v. Wong, 2006 CanLII 18516, 211 O.A.C. 201 (CA), at para. 13; R. v. Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96, 373 C.C.C. (3d) 433, at paras. 17-113; R. v. McPhee, 2018 ONCA 1016, 143 O.R. (3d) 763, at paras. [771]     I am satisfied beyo......
  • R v Richards, 2020 ABCA 63
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 10, 2020
    ...is “any hurt or injury that interferes in a substantial way with the integrity, health or well-being of the complainant”: R v Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96 at para 113, 373 CCC (3d) 433. See also R v McPhee, 2018 ONCA 1016, at paras 27-41, 368 CCC 3d 293 which regarded the ancient definition of ‘m......
  • R v Androsoff,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 29, 2023
    ...or causing bodily harm, or by choking, suffocating or strangling (s. 267), and aggravated assault (s. 268(1)) (see R v Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96 at paras 81–113, 373 CCC (3d) 433). [40]           A conviction for the offence of......
  • R v PO,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 21, 2021
    ...and as such would not qualify as bodily harm, and therefore, in my opinion, should also not qualify as a wound. [434] In R v Pootlass, 2019 BCCA 96 at paras 84 and 113 where Bennett JA in a unanimous British Columbia Court of Appeal decision defines the term “wound” in the following way: a ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT