R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Barrington-Foote,Kalmakoff,Richards |
Citation | 2022 SKCA 24 |
Date | 24 February 2022 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Docket Number | CACR3425 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v Hartnell,
...12 WWR 207; R v Aisaican, 2019 SKCA 58 at para 16, 377 CCC (3d) 114; R v Bear, 2020 SKCA 86 at para 20, 389 CCC (3d) 437; and R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24 at para 30, [2022] 10 WWR 26 As I will discuss, the proposed fresh evidence that Mr. Hartnell seeks to adduce fails to meet the threshold for......
-
R v Taylor,
...320 at para 30”. (Emphasis added) [63] More recently in R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24, [2022] 10 WWR 263, Kalmakoff J.A. returned to Learning to elaborate on the role of this Court on appeal: [81] Our role is limited to deter......
-
R v Taylor,
...such proof to absolute certainty: see R v Lifchus, [1997] 3 SCR 320 at para 30”. (Emphasis added) 63 More recently in R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24, [2022] 10 WWR 263, Kalmakoff J.A. returned to Learning to elaborate on the role of this Court on appeal: [81] Our role is limited to determin......
-
R v Whitstone,
...54), this was both an improper assumption and the taking of judicial notice in a matter that required specialized evidence: see R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24 at para 83, [2022] 10 WWR 263, and R v Zatrepalek, 2024 SKCA 27 at para 30 Having said this, in my view, the error in the trial judge's tre......
4 cases
-
R v Hartnell,
...12 WWR 207; R v Aisaican, 2019 SKCA 58 at para 16, 377 CCC (3d) 114; R v Bear, 2020 SKCA 86 at para 20, 389 CCC (3d) 437; and R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24 at para 30, [2022] 10 WWR 26 As I will discuss, the proposed fresh evidence that Mr. Hartnell seeks to adduce fails to meet the threshold for......
-
R v Taylor,
...320 at para 30”. (Emphasis added) [63] More recently in R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24, [2022] 10 WWR 263, Kalmakoff J.A. returned to Learning to elaborate on the role of this Court on appeal: [81] Our role is limited to deter......
-
R v Taylor,
...such proof to absolute certainty: see R v Lifchus, [1997] 3 SCR 320 at para 30”. (Emphasis added) 63 More recently in R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24, [2022] 10 WWR 263, Kalmakoff J.A. returned to Learning to elaborate on the role of this Court on appeal: [81] Our role is limited to determin......
-
R v Whitstone,
...54), this was both an improper assumption and the taking of judicial notice in a matter that required specialized evidence: see R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24 at para 83, [2022] 10 WWR 263, and R v Zatrepalek, 2024 SKCA 27 at para 30 Having said this, in my view, the error in the trial judge's tre......