R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeBarrington-Foote,Kalmakoff,Richards
Citation2022 SKCA 24
Date24 February 2022
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACR3425
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Hartnell,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 20, 2024
    ...12 WWR 207; R v Aisaican, 2019 SKCA 58 at para 16, 377 CCC (3d) 114; R v Bear, 2020 SKCA 86 at para 20, 389 CCC (3d) 437; and R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24 at para 30, [2022] 10 WWR 26 As I will discuss, the proposed fresh evidence that Mr. Hartnell seeks to adduce fails to meet the threshold for......
  • R v Taylor,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 26, 2023
    ...320 at para 30”. (Emphasis added) [63]           More recently in R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24, [2022] 10 WWR 263, Kalmakoff J.A. returned to Learning to elaborate on the role of this Court on appeal: [81] Our role is limited to deter......
  • R v Taylor,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 26, 2023
    ...such proof to absolute certainty: see R v Lifchus, [1997] 3 SCR 320 at para 30”. (Emphasis added) 63 More recently in R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24, [2022] 10 WWR 263, Kalmakoff J.A. returned to Learning to elaborate on the role of this Court on appeal: [81] Our role is limited to determin......
  • R v Whitstone,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 14, 2024
    ...54), this was both an improper assumption and the taking of judicial notice in a matter that required specialized evidence: see R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24 at para 83, [2022] 10 WWR 263, and R v Zatrepalek, 2024 SKCA 27 at para 30 Having said this, in my view, the error in the trial judge's tre......
4 cases
  • R v Hartnell,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 20, 2024
    ...12 WWR 207; R v Aisaican, 2019 SKCA 58 at para 16, 377 CCC (3d) 114; R v Bear, 2020 SKCA 86 at para 20, 389 CCC (3d) 437; and R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24 at para 30, [2022] 10 WWR 26 As I will discuss, the proposed fresh evidence that Mr. Hartnell seeks to adduce fails to meet the threshold for......
  • R v Taylor,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 26, 2023
    ...320 at para 30”. (Emphasis added) [63]           More recently in R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24, [2022] 10 WWR 263, Kalmakoff J.A. returned to Learning to elaborate on the role of this Court on appeal: [81] Our role is limited to deter......
  • R v Taylor,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 26, 2023
    ...such proof to absolute certainty: see R v Lifchus, [1997] 3 SCR 320 at para 30”. (Emphasis added) 63 More recently in R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24, [2022] 10 WWR 263, Kalmakoff J.A. returned to Learning to elaborate on the role of this Court on appeal: [81] Our role is limited to determin......
  • R v Whitstone,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 14, 2024
    ...54), this was both an improper assumption and the taking of judicial notice in a matter that required specialized evidence: see R v Power, 2022 SKCA 24 at para 83, [2022] 10 WWR 263, and R v Zatrepalek, 2024 SKCA 27 at para 30 Having said this, in my view, the error in the trial judge's tre......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT