R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling,The Honourable Madam Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf
Date07 April 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Docket Number1903-0116-A
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • R v Clarke,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 23, 2023
    ...view, the analysis of unreasonable delay of trial should be realistic in the context. Way is an example of that; see also R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136 at paras 57-64, 389 CCC (3d) 116. To me, the series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada on the subject have been precisely t......
  • Borgel v Paintearth (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2020 ABCA 321
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 14, 2020
    ...proceedings before the SDAB. A court would be entitled to accept the submissions of counsel on procedural facts: compare R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136 at para 42, 8 Alta LR (7th) 292; R v Doonanco, 2019 ABCA 118 at para 142, 373 CCC (3d) 275, appeal allowed on other grounds 2020 SCC 2, 100 ......
  • R v Clarke,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 23, 2023
    ...view, the analysis of unreasonable delay of trial should be realistic in the context. Way is an example of that; see also R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136 at paras 57-64, 389 CCC (3d) 116. To me, the series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada on the subject have been precisely t......
  • 2023 ABCA 62,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...view, the analysis of unreasonable delay of trial should be realistic in the context. Way is an example of that; see also R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136 at paras 57-64, 389 CCC (3d) 116. To me, the series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada on the subject have been precisely t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • R v Clarke,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 23, 2023
    ...view, the analysis of unreasonable delay of trial should be realistic in the context. Way is an example of that; see also R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136 at paras 57-64, 389 CCC (3d) 116. To me, the series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada on the subject have been precisely t......
  • Borgel v Paintearth (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2020 ABCA 321
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 14, 2020
    ...proceedings before the SDAB. A court would be entitled to accept the submissions of counsel on procedural facts: compare R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136 at para 42, 8 Alta LR (7th) 292; R v Doonanco, 2019 ABCA 118 at para 142, 373 CCC (3d) 275, appeal allowed on other grounds 2020 SCC 2, 100 ......
  • R v Clarke,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 23, 2023
    ...view, the analysis of unreasonable delay of trial should be realistic in the context. Way is an example of that; see also R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136 at paras 57-64, 389 CCC (3d) 116. To me, the series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada on the subject have been precisely t......
  • 2023 ABCA 62,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...view, the analysis of unreasonable delay of trial should be realistic in the context. Way is an example of that; see also R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136 at paras 57-64, 389 CCC (3d) 116. To me, the series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada on the subject have been precisely t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT