R. v. Punko (J.V.) et al., [2012] N.R. TBEd. JL.030
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., Deschamps, Fish, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Karakatsanis, JJ. |
| Citation | [2012] N.R. TBEd. JL.030,2012 SCC 39,433 NR 60,[2012] SCJ No 39 (QL),324 BCAC 23,[2012] 2 SCR 396 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 20 July 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
34 practice notes
-
R. v. Cowan,
...R. v. Mahalingan, 2008 SCC 63, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 316; R. v. Punko, 2012 SCC 39, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 396; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. MacKay, 2005 SCC 79, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725. Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C‑46, ss. 21 , 22 , 265(1) ......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 11-15, 2019)
...Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 20.04(2.1), R v Ferguson, 2008 SCC 6, British Columbia (Attorney General) v Malik, 2011 SCC 18, R v Punko, 2012 SCC 39, R v Mahalingan, 2008 SCC 63, Demeter v British Columbia (1983), 43 OR (2d) 33 (HC), aff'd (1984), 48 OR (2d) 283 (CA), Del Core v College Ph......
-
Stays of Proceedings
...undermined the argument that the relitigation of the conspiracy was 74 Toronto (City) v CUPE, Local 79 , supra note 8. 75 R v Punko , 2012 SCC 39 at para 21. 76 See the comments of McLachlin CJ in R v Mahalingan , 2008 SCC 63 at para 42, relying on this reality as one reason for retaining t......
-
Table of Cases
...93, 95 Punko, R v, 2010 BCCA 365 ................................................. . 127 Punko, R v, 2012 SCC 39 ................................................... 90-91 Quinton, R v, 2021 ONCA 44 ................................................. 94 Rahey, R v, [1987] 1 SCR 588, 1987 CanLI......
Get Started for Free
30 cases
-
R. v. Cowan, 2021 SCC 45
...R. v. Mahalingan, 2008 SCC 63, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 316; R. v. Punko, 2012 SCC 39, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 396; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. MacKay, 2005 SCC 79, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725. Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C‑46, ss. 21 , 22 , 265(1) ......
-
R. v. R.V., 2019 ONCA 664
...with the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, including Pittiman, on the subject of inconsistent verdicts, and with Mahalingan and R. v. Punko, 2012 SCC 39, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 396, on the subject of issue estoppel. Finally, his observations are grounded in principles of fairness of the criminal tria......
-
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc., 2020 FC 691
...the T/S and Blade snowmobiles. [57] BRP argues, on the basis of R v Mahalingan, 2008 SCC 63, [2008] 3 SCR 316 [Mahalingan], and R v Punko, 2012 SCC 39, [2012] 2 SCR 396 [Punko], both criminal cases with jury verdicts, that an issue estoppel plea is available but only if a somewhat strenuous......
-
Enmax Energy Corp. v. TransAlta Generation Partnership, 2015 ABCA 383
...Quadrangle Holdings Ltd. v. Coady et al. (2015), 355 N.S.R.(2d) 324; 2015 NSCA 13, refd to. [para. 58]. R. v. Punko (J.V.) et al., [2012] 2 S.C.R. 396; 433 N.R. 60; 324 B.C.A.C. 23; 551 W.A.C. 23; 2012 SCC 39, refd to. [para. 58]. R. v. Biniaris (J.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381; 252 N.R. 204; 134 ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 11-15, 2019)
...Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 20.04(2.1), R v Ferguson, 2008 SCC 6, British Columbia (Attorney General) v Malik, 2011 SCC 18, R v Punko, 2012 SCC 39, R v Mahalingan, 2008 SCC 63, Demeter v British Columbia (1983), 43 OR (2d) 33 (HC), aff'd (1984), 48 OR (2d) 283 (CA), Del Core v College Ph......
3 books & journal articles
-
Stays of Proceedings
...undermined the argument that the relitigation of the conspiracy was 74 Toronto (City) v CUPE, Local 79 , supra note 8. 75 R v Punko , 2012 SCC 39 at para 21. 76 See the comments of McLachlin CJ in R v Mahalingan , 2008 SCC 63 at para 42, relying on this reality as one reason for retaining t......
-
Table of Cases
...93, 95 Punko, R v, 2010 BCCA 365 ................................................. . 127 Punko, R v, 2012 SCC 39 ................................................... 90-91 Quinton, R v, 2021 ONCA 44 ................................................. 94 Rahey, R v, [1987] 1 SCR 588, 1987 CanLI......
-
Justifying true questions of jurisdiction.
...not be discussed. (19) Based on a CanLII search for the word "jurisdiction" within Supreme Court of Canada cases on June 22, 2013. (20) 2012 SCC 39, [2012] 2 SCR (21) Ibid at para 2. (22) 2011 SCC 65, [2011] 3 SCR 819. (23) Ibid at para 27. (24) [1990] 3 SCR 1112, 76 DLR (4th) 1. (25) Supra......