R. v. Pye, 2019 YKTC 21
| Jurisdiction | Yukon |
| Judge | Ruddy |
| Citation | 2019 YKTC 21 |
| Date | 17 April 2019 |
| Court | Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 17-00306 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
R v C.C.S.,
...incarceration plus 12 months’ probation. [49] In R v Pye, 2019 YKTC 21 the victim was 14 and the offender 21. The accused was aware of the complainants age before they met up. They got together and bo......
-
R. v. C.A.B.,
...In R. v. D.A.D., 2021 YKTC 20, Chief Judge Cozens of the Territorial Court of Yukon relied on R. v. Pye, 2019 YKTC 21 [Pye], and declared the minimum mandatory sentence in s. 151(b) unconstitutional. As indicated at para. 15, the Crown submitted that, in light of Friesen, Pye shou......
-
R v Pauloosie,
...ranged from a 12-month conditional sentence order (“CSO”) to 18 months in prison followed by a period of probation: R v Pye, 2019 YKTC 21 (12-month CSO); R v Alfred, 2019 BCSC 1452, aff’d 2021 BCCA 71 (9 months imprisonment and 2 years probation); R v Menicoche, 2016 YK......
-
R v M-M,
...cases that illustrate “reasonably foreseeable” scenarios: R v Gargan, 2021 NWTTC 9 (Gargan), based on the facts; R v Pye, 2019 YKTC 21 (Pye), where that court considered hypothetical scenarios; R v DAD, 2021 YKTC 20 (DAD), the same scenarios as considered in Pye; R v Drumonde,......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
R v C.C.S.,
...incarceration plus 12 months’ probation. [49] In R v Pye, 2019 YKTC 21 the victim was 14 and the offender 21. The accused was aware of the complainants age before they met up. They got together and bo......
-
R. v. C.A.B.,
...In R. v. D.A.D., 2021 YKTC 20, Chief Judge Cozens of the Territorial Court of Yukon relied on R. v. Pye, 2019 YKTC 21 [Pye], and declared the minimum mandatory sentence in s. 151(b) unconstitutional. As indicated at para. 15, the Crown submitted that, in light of Friesen, Pye shou......
-
R v Pauloosie,
...ranged from a 12-month conditional sentence order (“CSO”) to 18 months in prison followed by a period of probation: R v Pye, 2019 YKTC 21 (12-month CSO); R v Alfred, 2019 BCSC 1452, aff’d 2021 BCCA 71 (9 months imprisonment and 2 years probation); R v Menicoche, 2016 YK......
-
R v M-M,
...cases that illustrate “reasonably foreseeable” scenarios: R v Gargan, 2021 NWTTC 9 (Gargan), based on the facts; R v Pye, 2019 YKTC 21 (Pye), where that court considered hypothetical scenarios; R v DAD, 2021 YKTC 20 (DAD), the same scenarios as considered in Pye; R v Drumonde,......
Request a trial to view additional results