R. v. R. D.,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeLauwers, van Rensburg and Hourigan JJ.A.
Citation2019 ONCA 951
Docket NumberC56617; C58709
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date04 December 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 2 – December 6, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 11, 2019
    ...Jury Instructions, Vetrovec Warning, R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168, R. v. Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15, R. v. Hall, 2010 ONCA 724 R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951 Keywords: Criminal Law, Unlawful Confinement, Sexual Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Choking with Intent, Sentencing, R. v. Corbett, [1988] 1 ......
  • R. v. King,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 26, 2022
    ...was not unreasonable, reflects no error in principle and is not tainted by a misapprehension of the material facts: see R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304, at para. [202]   This ground of appeal must fail. CONCLUSION [203]   For the reasons given, we would di......
  • R. v. McRae,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 4, 2020
    ...significant challenges. The trial judge’s decisions on these applications will be entitled to appellate deference: R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, at para. 13; R. v. Joseph, 2020 ONCA 73, at para. 72. As counsel for the applicant fairly acknowledged in oral submissions, the trial judge&#x......
  • R v I.T.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 7, 2024
    ...of the material facts, or was an unreasonable exercise of discretion: R. v. Asante, 2022 ONCA 657, at para. 21, citing R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 8 Credibility is the key consideration when deciding the probative value of past convictions on a Corbett application: “[t]he pro......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • R. v. King, 2022 ONCA 665
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 26, 2022
    ...was not unreasonable, reflects no error in principle and is not tainted by a misapprehension of the material facts: see R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304, at para. [202]   This ground of appeal must fail. CONCLUSION [203]   For the reasons given, we would di......
  • R. v. McRae, 2020 ONCA 498
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 4, 2020
    ...significant challenges. The trial judge’s decisions on these applications will be entitled to appellate deference: R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, at para. 13; R. v. Joseph, 2020 ONCA 73, at para. 72. As counsel for the applicant fairly acknowledged in oral submissions, the trial judge&#x......
  • Her Majesty the Queen v. R.D., 2021 ONSC 4158
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 8, 2021
    ...Appeal upheld the convictions but sent the matter back for a new hearing on the Dangerous Offender designation and sentence: R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951. The sentencing was an error as the Code had been amended to allow the court to consider options upon designating someone a dangerous offend......
  • R v Champagne,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 19, 2024
    ...paragraph 20; and R. v. N.A.P. [2002] O.J. No. 4829, a decision of Ontario Court of Appeal at paragraph 20; and most recently R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951 at paragraph 14 The most serious conviction in the accused criminal record is attempt murder. The Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. R.D. has......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 2 – December 6, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 11, 2019
    ...Jury Instructions, Vetrovec Warning, R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168, R. v. Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15, R. v. Hall, 2010 ONCA 724 R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951 Keywords: Criminal Law, Unlawful Confinement, Sexual Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Choking with Intent, Sentencing, R. v. Corbett, [1988] 1 ......