R. v. R. D., 2019 ONCA 951
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Lauwers, van Rensburg and Hourigan JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2019 ONCA 951 |
| Docket Number | C56617; C58709 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 04 December 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 2 December 6, 2019)
...Jury Instructions, Vetrovec Warning, R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168, R. v. Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15, R. v. Hall, 2010 ONCA 724 R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951 Keywords: Criminal Law, Unlawful Confinement, Sexual Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Choking with Intent, Sentencing, R. v. Corbett, [1988] 1 ......
-
R. v. King,
...was not unreasonable, reflects no error in principle and is not tainted by a misapprehension of the material facts: see R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304, at para. [202] This ground of appeal must fail. CONCLUSION [203] For the reasons given, we would di......
-
R. v. McRae, 2020 ONCA 498
...significant challenges. The trial judge’s decisions on these applications will be entitled to appellate deference: R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, at para. 13; R. v. Joseph, 2020 ONCA 73, at para. 72. As counsel for the applicant fairly acknowledged in oral submissions, the trial judge&#x......
-
Her Majesty the Queen v. R.D.,
...Appeal upheld the convictions but sent the matter back for a new hearing on the Dangerous Offender designation and sentence: R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951. The sentencing was an error as the Code had been amended to allow the court to consider options upon designating someone a dangerous offend......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R. v. King,
...was not unreasonable, reflects no error in principle and is not tainted by a misapprehension of the material facts: see R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304, at para. [202] This ground of appeal must fail. CONCLUSION [203] For the reasons given, we would di......
-
R. v. McRae, 2020 ONCA 498
...significant challenges. The trial judge’s decisions on these applications will be entitled to appellate deference: R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, at para. 13; R. v. Joseph, 2020 ONCA 73, at para. 72. As counsel for the applicant fairly acknowledged in oral submissions, the trial judge&#x......
-
Her Majesty the Queen v. R.D.,
...Appeal upheld the convictions but sent the matter back for a new hearing on the Dangerous Offender designation and sentence: R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951. The sentencing was an error as the Code had been amended to allow the court to consider options upon designating someone a dangerous offend......
-
R. v. Vidinovski, 2020 ONCA 433
...these previous convictions, but he also provided the jury with a strong caution. [13] In R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, at para. 13, this court said that “deference is owed to a trial judge’s determination of a Corbett application. … ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 2 December 6, 2019)
...Jury Instructions, Vetrovec Warning, R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168, R. v. Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15, R. v. Hall, 2010 ONCA 724 R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951 Keywords: Criminal Law, Unlawful Confinement, Sexual Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Choking with Intent, Sentencing, R. v. Corbett, [1988] 1 ......