R. v. R. D.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeLauwers, van Rensburg and Hourigan JJ.A.
Citation2019 ONCA 951
Date04 December 2019
Docket NumberC56617; C58709

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 practice notes
  • R. v. Hussein
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 23, 2026
    ...v. Gibson, 2001 BCCA 297, 153 C.C.C. (3d) 465; R. v. P. (N.A.) (2002), 171 C.C.C. (3d) 70; LSJPA — 1037, 2010 QCCA 1627; R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304; State v. Duke, 123 A.2d 745 (N.H. 1956); R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S......
  • R v Hussein
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 23, 2026
    ...R. v. Gibson, 2001 BCCA 297, 153 C.C.C. (3d) 465; R. v. P. (N.A.) (2002), 171 C.C.C. (3d) 70; LSJPA — 1037, 2010 QCCA 1627; R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304; State v. Duke, 123 A.2d 745 (N.H. 1956); R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 2 – December 6, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 11, 2019
    ...Jury Instructions, Vetrovec Warning, R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168, R. v. Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15, R. v. Hall, 2010 ONCA 724 R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951 Keywords: Criminal Law, Unlawful Confinement, Sexual Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Choking with Intent, Sentencing, R. v. Corbett, [1988] 1 ......
  • R. v. King
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 26, 2022
    ...was not unreasonable, reflects no error in principle and is not tainted by a misapprehension of the material facts: see R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304, at para. [202]   This ground of appeal must fail. CONCLUSION [203]   For the reasons given, we would di......
  • Get Started for Free
12 cases
  • R. v. Hussein
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 23, 2026
    ...v. Gibson, 2001 BCCA 297, 153 C.C.C. (3d) 465; R. v. P. (N.A.) (2002), 171 C.C.C. (3d) 70; LSJPA — 1037, 2010 QCCA 1627; R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304; State v. Duke, 123 A.2d 745 (N.H. 1956); R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S......
  • R v Hussein
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 23, 2026
    ...R. v. Gibson, 2001 BCCA 297, 153 C.C.C. (3d) 465; R. v. P. (N.A.) (2002), 171 C.C.C. (3d) 70; LSJPA — 1037, 2010 QCCA 1627; R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304; State v. Duke, 123 A.2d 745 (N.H. 1956); R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C......
  • R. v. King
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 26, 2022
    ...was not unreasonable, reflects no error in principle and is not tainted by a misapprehension of the material facts: see R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304, at para. [202]   This ground of appeal must fail. CONCLUSION [203]   For the reasons given, we would di......
  • 2025 ONCA 638
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2025
    ...on their criminal record. Accordingly, “cross-examination on the accused's criminal record will be the usual course”: R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 304, at para. 13, citing R. v. P. (N.A.) (2002), 167 O.A.C. 176 (C.A.), at para. 48 The presumptive admissibility of prior convict......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 2 – December 6, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 11, 2019
    ...Jury Instructions, Vetrovec Warning, R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168, R. v. Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15, R. v. Hall, 2010 ONCA 724 R. v. R.D., 2019 ONCA 951 Keywords: Criminal Law, Unlawful Confinement, Sexual Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Choking with Intent, Sentencing, R. v. Corbett, [1988] 1 ......