R. v. Rebelo (A.), [2003] O.T.C. 1040 (SC)
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Case Date | Wednesday November 26, 2003 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | [2003] O.T.C. 1040 (SC) |
R. v. Rebelo (A.), [2003] O.T.C. 1040 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2003] O.T.C. TBEd. NO.103
Her Majesty the Queen v. Ava Rebelo
(Court File No. 6231/02)
Indexed As: R. v. Rebelo (A.)
Court of Ontario
Superior Court of Justice
Durno, R.S.J.
November 26, 2003.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 1368
Offences against person and reputation - Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Care or control or operating - What constitutes - See paragraphs 1 to 57.
Criminal Law - Topic 1374
Offences against person and reputation - Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Breathalyzer or blood sample - Evidence and certificate evidence (incl. evidence tending to show) - See paragraphs 1 to 57.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Gosby (1974), 8 N.S.R.(2d) 183; 16 C.C.C.(3d) 228 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].
R. v. Cardinal (S.R.) (2001), 301 A.R. 1 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 19].
R. v. Shadoff, [1993] O.J. No. 534 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 19].
R. v. Klassen (1986), 45 M.V.R. 5 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 29].
R. v. Bykowski (1980), 23 A.R. 426; 54 C.C.C.(3d) 398 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1980), 33 N.R. 584; 24 A.R. 360 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 30].
R. v. Ryden (M.J.) (1993), 145 A.R. 194; 55 W.A.C. 194; 86 C.C.C.(3d) 57 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].
R. v. Mabel (1972), 6 C.C.C.(3d) 467 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. Zeimer (W.R.) (1993), 127 N.S.R.(2d) 127; 355 A.P.R. 127; 1 M.V.R.(3d) 34 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].
R. v. Cassidy (1986), 75 N.S.R.(2d) 60; 186 A.P.R. 60; 44 M.V.R. 63 (Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 33].
R. v. Anderson (1982), 15 Sask.R. 347; 13 M.V.R. 157 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Berehula (1980), 6 Sask.R. 181; 9 M.V.R. 25 (Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Noble (1977), 17 N.R. 555; 19 N.B.R.(2d) 417; 30 A.P.R. 417; 37 C.C.C.(2d) 193 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 37].
R. v. Ford, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 231; 40 N.R. 451; 36 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 254; 101 A.P.R. 254; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 392; 13 M.V.R. 237; 133 D.L.R.(3d) 567, refd to. [para. 46].
R. v. Toews, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 119; 61 N.R. 349; 47 C.R.(3d) 213; 20 D.L.R.(4th) 758; [1985] 6 W.W.R. 158; 21 C.C.C.(3d) 24, refd to. [para. 46].
R. v. Wren (K.A.) (2000), 130 O.A.C. 302; 144 C.C.C.(3d) 374 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].
R. v. Lackovic (1988), 29 O.A.C. 382; 45 C.C.C.(3d) 80 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].
R. v. Saikaley (1979), 52 C.C.C.(2d) 191 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].
R. v. Coultis (1982), 66 C.C.C.(2d) 385 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].
R. v. Shropshire (M.T.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; 188 N.R. 284; 65 B.C.A.C. 37; 106 W.A.C. 37; 102 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 129 D.L.R.(4th) 657; 43 C.R.(4th) 269, refd to. [para. 55].
R. v. C.A.M. (1996), 194 N.R. 321; 73 B.C.A.C. 81; 120 W.A.C. 81; 105 C.C.C.(3d) 327 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 55].
Counsel:
Linda C. Price, for the respondent/Crown;
Paul Calarco, for the appellant.
This appeal was heard before Durno, R.S.J., of the Ontario Superior Court. The following decision was endorsed on the record and released on November 26, 2003.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
