R. v. Reed, (1982) 18 Sask.R. 357 (QB)
Judge | Geatros, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Case Date | August 18, 1982 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | (1982), 18 Sask.R. 357 (QB) |
R. v. Reed (1982), 18 Sask.R. 357 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Reed
(No. 21 A.D. 1981)
Indexed As: R. v. Reed
Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial Centre of Wynyard
Geatros, J.
August 18, 1982.
Summary:
An accused was acquitted of a charge of driving with an excessive blood-alcohol content contrary to s. 236 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The Crown appealed.
The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the appeal.
Criminal Law - Topic 1376
Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Breathalyzer - Proof of blood-alcohol content - Two breath samples were taken more than two hours after an offence under s. 236 was alleged to have been committed - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench held that the Crown could not therefore rely on the presumption that the result of the chemical analysis was proof of the proportion of alcohol in the blood at the time of the offence - The court stated that where the presumption was inapplicable, the Crown must prove all the elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt - See paragraphs 2 to 6.
Evidence - Topic 7009
Opinion evidence - Expert evidence - Proof of assumptions - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench applied the principle that where an expert's testimony is based on assumptions, the testimony should not be accepted unless there is evidence to substantiate or give basis in fact to the assumptions - See paragraphs 2, 7 to 8.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Nelson (1982), 16 Sask.R. 391 (Sask. Q.B.), folld. [para. 4].
R. v. Pitura, [1975] W.W.D. 185, refd to. [para. 6].
R. v. Brandt (1978-79), 3 W.C.B. 437, appld. [para. 7].
Statutes Noticed:
Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 237(1)(c) [para. 4].
Counsel:
L.A. Matsalla, for the Crown;
R.A. Leland, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard before GEATROS, J., of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Wynyard. The decision of GEATROS, J., was delivered at Melville, Saskatchewan, on August 18, 1982:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Clark (B.), (1995) 135 Sask.R. 103 (QB)
...(1986), 54 Sask.R. 303 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46]. R. v. Nelson (1982), 16 Sask.R. 391 (Dist. Ct.), consd. [para. 48]. R. v. Reed (1982), 18 Sask.R. 357 (Q.B.), consd. [para. R. v. Isleifson (1986), 42 M.V.R. 309 (Ont. H.C.), consd. [para. 50]. R. v. English (1982), 47 Alta. L.R.(2d) 372 (......
-
R. v. Shoemaker (J.J.), (2011) 261 Man.R.(2d) 182 (PC)
...8]. R. v. Evans, 2008 ONCJ 778, refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Nelson (1982), 16 Sask.R. 391 (Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Reed (1982), 18 Sask.R. 357 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. R. v. Drummond (J.B.) (2000), 188 Sask.R. 173; 2000 SKQB 15, refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Turgeon (L.G.) (2002), ......
-
R. v. Flynn (B.P.), (1996) 138 Sask.R. 315 (QB)
...- [See Criminal Law - Topic 1362 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Nelson (1982), 16 Sask.R. 391 (Dist. Ct.), consd. [para. 10]. R. v. Reed (1982), 18 Sask.R. 357 (Q.B.), consd. [para. R. v. English (1982), 47 Alta. L.R.(2d) 372 (C.A.), consd. [para. 12]. R. v. Dean (1992), 127 A.R. 376; 20 W.A.C. 37......
-
R. v. Clark (B.), (1995) 135 Sask.R. 103 (QB)
...(1986), 54 Sask.R. 303 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46]. R. v. Nelson (1982), 16 Sask.R. 391 (Dist. Ct.), consd. [para. 48]. R. v. Reed (1982), 18 Sask.R. 357 (Q.B.), consd. [para. R. v. Isleifson (1986), 42 M.V.R. 309 (Ont. H.C.), consd. [para. 50]. R. v. English (1982), 47 Alta. L.R.(2d) 372 (......
-
R. v. Shoemaker (J.J.), (2011) 261 Man.R.(2d) 182 (PC)
...8]. R. v. Evans, 2008 ONCJ 778, refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Nelson (1982), 16 Sask.R. 391 (Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Reed (1982), 18 Sask.R. 357 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. R. v. Drummond (J.B.) (2000), 188 Sask.R. 173; 2000 SKQB 15, refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Turgeon (L.G.) (2002), ......
-
R. v. Flynn (B.P.), (1996) 138 Sask.R. 315 (QB)
...- [See Criminal Law - Topic 1362 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Nelson (1982), 16 Sask.R. 391 (Dist. Ct.), consd. [para. 10]. R. v. Reed (1982), 18 Sask.R. 357 (Q.B.), consd. [para. R. v. English (1982), 47 Alta. L.R.(2d) 372 (C.A.), consd. [para. 12]. R. v. Dean (1992), 127 A.R. 376; 20 W.A.C. 37......