R. v. Rickett (D.E.), 2012 ABPC 152
| Judge | Johnson, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS |
| Citation | 2012 ABPC 152,[2012] A.R. Uned. 189,[2012] A.R. Uned. 189 (PC) |
| Date | 04 June 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Muhle (K.T.), [2013] A.R. Uned. 290
...that the device he used was an "approved screening device". I respectfully adopt Judge E. Johnson's statement of the law in R. v. Rickett 2012 ABPC 152 at paragraph 51: 50 The law permits an officer to rely on the "fail" result to form the grounds to make an evidential breath demand where t......
-
R. v. Chalifoux (T.S.), [2014] A.R. Uned. 780 (PC)
...belief that the screening device he was using was an approved screening device. I rely on the analyses set out in R. v. Rickett 2012 ABPC 152; R. v. Winters (2011) 25 M.V.R. (6th) 85 (Alta. Prov. Ct.) at paragraph 32; and R. v. Muhle 2013 ABPC 74 at paragraphs 46-62. [47] A/S Fassnidge beli......
2 cases
-
R. v. Muhle (K.T.), [2013] A.R. Uned. 290
...that the device he used was an "approved screening device". I respectfully adopt Judge E. Johnson's statement of the law in R. v. Rickett 2012 ABPC 152 at paragraph 51: 50 The law permits an officer to rely on the "fail" result to form the grounds to make an evidential breath demand where t......
-
R. v. Chalifoux (T.S.), [2014] A.R. Uned. 780 (PC)
...belief that the screening device he was using was an approved screening device. I rely on the analyses set out in R. v. Rickett 2012 ABPC 152; R. v. Winters (2011) 25 M.V.R. (6th) 85 (Alta. Prov. Ct.) at paragraph 32; and R. v. Muhle 2013 ABPC 74 at paragraphs 46-62. [47] A/S Fassnidge beli......