R. v. Rochon (N.), (2012) 437 N.R. 215 (SCC)
Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Case Date | October 16, 2012 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (2012), 437 N.R. 215 (SCC);2012 SCC 50;[2012] 2 SCR 673 |
R. v. Rochon (N.) (2012), 437 N.R. 215 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
.........................
Temp. Cite: [2012] N.R. TBEd. OC.024
Her Majesty the Queen (appellant) v. Nicole Rochon (respondent) and Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada (intervener)
(34557; 2012 SCC 50; 2012 CSC 50)
Indexed As: R. v. Rochon (N.)
Supreme Court of Canada
McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver, JJ.
October 16, 2012.
Summary:
The accused was charged with illegal production of marijuana and with illegal possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking.
The Court of Québec, Criminal and Penal Chamber, found the accused guilty. The accused appealed.
The Quebec Court of Appeal, Dalphond, J.A., dissenting, in a decision reported 437 N.R. 216, allowed the appeal and entered acquittals. The prosecution appealed.
The Supreme Court of Canada, Cromwell, J., dissenting, dismissed the appeal.
Criminal Law - Topic 2742
Attempts, conspiracies, accessories and parties - Parties to offences - Necessary intention or knowledge - The accused went away and left her land in the care of her adult son - When she came back, there was marijuana growing on her land - She told her son to remove it - She also declined to call the police because she did not want to "squeal" on her son - The accused was charged with illegal production of marijuana and with illegal possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking - The Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the accused's acquittal - The court stated that the evidence was insufficient to establish the required degree of certainty that the accused had acted, or failed to act, for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the crimes mentioned in the indictment, "even if that was clearly the result" - See paragraphs 1 to 3.
Counsel:
None disclosed.
Solicitors of Record :
None disclosed.
This appeal was heard by McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell and Moldaver, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada. The following decision of the Supreme Court was delivered in both official languages on October 16, 2012, and the following reasons were filed:
Fish, J. (McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Abella, Rothstein and Moldaver, JJ., concurring) - see paragraphs 1 to 3;
Cromwell, J., dissenting - see paragraph 4.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Table of cases
...153 CCC (3d) 398, [2001] OJ No 1072 (CA) .............................................................................. 505 R v Rochon, [2012] 2 SCR 673, 2012 SCC 50, af’g 2011 QCCA 2012 ........ 176, 177 R v Rodney, [1990] 2 SCR 687, 58 CCC (3d) 408, 79 CR (3d) 187 ........... 184, 458 R v......
-
Table of Cases
...R v Robinson, [1996] 1 SCR 683, 105 CCC (3d) 97, 46 CR (4th) 1 .....................86, 202, 283, 284–85, 306, 564 R v Rochon, [2012] 2 SCR 673, 2012 SCC 50, aff’g 2011 QCCA 2012 ............... 169 R v Rodney, [1990] 2 SCR 687, 58 CCC (3d) 408, 79 CR (3d) 187, ............177, 439 R v Rojo......
-
Unfulfilled Crimes and Participation in Crimes
...J concurring) [ Kirkness ]. 111 R v Jackson , 2007 SCC 52 at paras 3 and 9 [ Jackson ]. 112 R v Knapczyk , 2016 SCC 10. 113 R v Rochon , [2012] 2 SCR 673, aff’g 2011 QCCA 2012. 114 R v Vu , [2012] 2 SCR 411 at paras 59–60 [ Vu ]. 115 R v Halmo (1941), 76 CCC 116 (Ont CA); R v Kulbacki , [19......
-
Unfulfilled Crimes and Participation in Crimes
...[ Kirkness ]. 120 R v Jackson , 2007 SCC 52 at paras 3 and 9 [ Jackson 2007]. 121 R v Knapczyk , 2016 SCC 10. 122 R v Rochon , [2012] 2 SCR 673, af’g 2011 QCCA 2012. 123 R v Vu , [2012] 2 SCR 411 at paras 59–60. 124 R v Johnson , 2017 NSCA 64 at 106; R v Dooley , 2009 ONCA 910 at 123. 125 R......
-
Conseil Canadien de la Magistrature c. Girouard,
...attention to various passages from, notably, Therrien (Re), 2001 SCC 35, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 3 (Therrien) and Valente v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 673 (Valente). It also states that the motions judge was wrong to distinguish this case from Minister of Indian Aairs and Northern Developm......
-
R. v. Russell, 2020 BCCA 108
...or failure to act, will only give rise to liability where some positive duty exists: R. v. Rochon, 2011 QCCA 2012 at paras. 12–28, aff’d 2012 SCC 50. [76] The standard for assisting or encouraging is not a high one. The Crown does not have to prove that the crime would not have occurred but......
-
R. v. Delege, 2018 BCCA 200
...other operations. [At. para. 25; emphasis added.] [7] The defence relied heavily on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R. v. Rochon 2012 SCC 50. The accused in that case was the mother of a son to whom she had entrusted her property while she was away. On her return, she discovered a......
-
R. v. Serban, 2017 BCSC 16
...the police for the purpose of aiding him in the commission of the offence. The decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada: 2012 SCC 50. The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada agreed with the majority of the Quebec Court of Appeal. Fish J. stated: “…the evi......
-
Table of cases
...153 CCC (3d) 398, [2001] OJ No 1072 (CA) .............................................................................. 505 R v Rochon, [2012] 2 SCR 673, 2012 SCC 50, af’g 2011 QCCA 2012 ........ 176, 177 R v Rodney, [1990] 2 SCR 687, 58 CCC (3d) 408, 79 CR (3d) 187 ........... 184, 458 R v......
-
Table of Cases
...R v Robinson, [1996] 1 SCR 683, 105 CCC (3d) 97, 46 CR (4th) 1 .....................86, 202, 283, 284–85, 306, 564 R v Rochon, [2012] 2 SCR 673, 2012 SCC 50, aff’g 2011 QCCA 2012 ............... 169 R v Rodney, [1990] 2 SCR 687, 58 CCC (3d) 408, 79 CR (3d) 187, ............177, 439 R v Rojo......
-
Unfulfilled Crimes and Participation in Crimes
...J concurring) [ Kirkness ]. 111 R v Jackson , 2007 SCC 52 at paras 3 and 9 [ Jackson ]. 112 R v Knapczyk , 2016 SCC 10. 113 R v Rochon , [2012] 2 SCR 673, aff’g 2011 QCCA 2012. 114 R v Vu , [2012] 2 SCR 411 at paras 59–60 [ Vu ]. 115 R v Halmo (1941), 76 CCC 116 (Ont CA); R v Kulbacki , [19......
-
Unfulfilled Crimes and Participation in Crimes
...[ Kirkness ]. 120 R v Jackson , 2007 SCC 52 at paras 3 and 9 [ Jackson 2007]. 121 R v Knapczyk , 2016 SCC 10. 122 R v Rochon , [2012] 2 SCR 673, af’g 2011 QCCA 2012. 123 R v Vu , [2012] 2 SCR 411 at paras 59–60. 124 R v Johnson , 2017 NSCA 64 at 106; R v Dooley , 2009 ONCA 910 at 123. 125 R......