R. v. De Rojas (M.L.C.S.), [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3227 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Hill, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE |
| Citation | [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3227 (SC),[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3227,2012 ONSC 3227 |
| Date | 23 October 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Buzny,
...judge explicitly cautioned himself against doing so when describing the third limb of the W.(D.) test. He also referred to R. v. DeRojas, 2012 ONSC 3227, as an example of the authorities that prohibited him from doing so. [45] I also reject the appe......
-
R. v. Guerra (K.A.), [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 6629 (SC)
...was introduced into evidence on consent as exhibit 2. 4. R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. 5. Supra, note 1, s. 2 (1). 6. See R. v. De Rojas , 2012 ONSC 3227 (S.C.J.) at para. 78 and the cases cited there. 7. R. v. G. (M.) (1995), 93 C.C.C. (3d) 347 (Ont. C.A.). 8. R. v. De Rojas, supra note 6 at para.......
-
R. v. Coutts, 2019 ONSC 1413
...the need for further inquiries, but deliberately chooses not to make those inquiries. [Emphasis in original.] [75] In R. v. De Rojas, 2012 ONSC 3227, wherein Hill J. relied on R. v. Lincoln, 2012 ONCA 542; R. v. Aiello; and R. v. Pham (2005),77 O.R.(3d) 401, aff'd 2006 SCC 26, [2006] 1 S.C.......
3 cases
-
R. v. Buzny,
...judge explicitly cautioned himself against doing so when describing the third limb of the W.(D.) test. He also referred to R. v. DeRojas, 2012 ONSC 3227, as an example of the authorities that prohibited him from doing so. [45] I also reject the appe......
-
R. v. Guerra (K.A.), [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 6629 (SC)
...was introduced into evidence on consent as exhibit 2. 4. R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. 5. Supra, note 1, s. 2 (1). 6. See R. v. De Rojas , 2012 ONSC 3227 (S.C.J.) at para. 78 and the cases cited there. 7. R. v. G. (M.) (1995), 93 C.C.C. (3d) 347 (Ont. C.A.). 8. R. v. De Rojas, supra note 6 at para.......
-
R. v. Coutts, 2019 ONSC 1413
...the need for further inquiries, but deliberately chooses not to make those inquiries. [Emphasis in original.] [75] In R. v. De Rojas, 2012 ONSC 3227, wherein Hill J. relied on R. v. Lincoln, 2012 ONCA 542; R. v. Aiello; and R. v. Pham (2005),77 O.R.(3d) 401, aff'd 2006 SCC 26, [2006] 1 S.C.......