R. v. Ross (A.J.), [2004] A.R. Uned. 487 (QB)

JudgeWatson, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,NARCOTIC CONTROL
Citation[2004] A.R. Uned. 487 (QB),[2004] A.R. Uned. 487,2004 ABQB 524
Date06 July 2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Machushek (J.K.), 2016 SKCA 41
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 9 Septiembre 2015
    ...127 BCAC 247 [ Unger ]; R v Ryan , [2000] OJ No 5353 (QL) (Sup Ct) [ Ryan ]; R v Ahamad (2003), 181 CCC (3d) 56 (Ont Sup Ct); R v Ross , 2004 ABQB 524, 2 WWR 131 (aff'd 2005 ABCA 123); and R v Thompson , 2014 SKPC 9. [32] Applying this case law, the trial judge concluded that Mr. Machushek ......
  • R. v. MacDonald (C.J.), 2014 BCSC 2406
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 14 Noviembre 2014
    ...inference is that the trial court convicted Mr. Unger on the basis that he was a party, rather than a principal. [98] R. v. Ross , 2004 ABQB 524, aff'd 2005 ABCA 123, might appear to be an exception. The accused was acquitted at trial and the Crown's appeal was dismissed. The essential fact......
2 cases
  • R. v. Machushek (J.K.), 2016 SKCA 41
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 9 Septiembre 2015
    ...127 BCAC 247 [ Unger ]; R v Ryan , [2000] OJ No 5353 (QL) (Sup Ct) [ Ryan ]; R v Ahamad (2003), 181 CCC (3d) 56 (Ont Sup Ct); R v Ross , 2004 ABQB 524, 2 WWR 131 (aff'd 2005 ABCA 123); and R v Thompson , 2014 SKPC 9. [32] Applying this case law, the trial judge concluded that Mr. Machushek ......
  • R. v. MacDonald (C.J.), 2014 BCSC 2406
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 14 Noviembre 2014
    ...inference is that the trial court convicted Mr. Unger on the basis that he was a party, rather than a principal. [98] R. v. Ross , 2004 ABQB 524, aff'd 2005 ABCA 123, might appear to be an exception. The accused was acquitted at trial and the Crown's appeal was dismissed. The essential fact......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT