R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 8
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Honourable Justice Carole A. Beaton |
| Docket Number | CAC 481450 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Date | 29 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Chambers,
...1 S.C.R. 759; R. v. Hannan, 2023 NSCA 7; R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40; R. v. Delorey, 2010 NSCA 65; and Rouse v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2020 NSCA 8. Summary: The appellant did not make a motion to adduce fresh evidence, but referred to new evidence in his submissions. Even properly con......
-
R v Wallace,
...R v Coburn, 2021 NSCA 1 at ¶ 36; clearly, there was a commodification of the sexual services AC provided to Mr Wallace: R v Rouse, 2020 NSCA 8 at ¶ 11. This is the essence of obtaining sexual services for consideration. The fact that the money might never have gotten paid&#x......
-
Judges on Judging in Canadian Appellate Courts: The Role of Legal and Extra-Legal Factors on Decision-Making.
...from newspaper accounts and our conversations with the judges, we believe we have a diversity of ideologies included in the sample. (38) 2020 NSCA 8 (39) Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, s 286.1(1). (40) Rouse, supra note 38 at para 35. (41) See "Annual Report: Court of Appeal for British C......
-
R. v. C.T.B.,
...s. 535 had to be correct, otherwise appellate intervention is warranted (See R. v. Carvery, 2012 NSCA 107, at para. 31, and R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 8, at para. [29] A preliminary inquiry is a statutory process conducted by a statutory court that can only exercise the power it is given. There......
3 cases
-
R. v. Chambers,
...1 S.C.R. 759; R. v. Hannan, 2023 NSCA 7; R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40; R. v. Delorey, 2010 NSCA 65; and Rouse v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2020 NSCA 8. Summary: The appellant did not make a motion to adduce fresh evidence, but referred to new evidence in his submissions. Even properly con......
-
R v Wallace,
...R v Coburn, 2021 NSCA 1 at ¶ 36; clearly, there was a commodification of the sexual services AC provided to Mr Wallace: R v Rouse, 2020 NSCA 8 at ¶ 11. This is the essence of obtaining sexual services for consideration. The fact that the money might never have gotten paid&#x......
-
R. v. C.T.B.,
...s. 535 had to be correct, otherwise appellate intervention is warranted (See R. v. Carvery, 2012 NSCA 107, at para. 31, and R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 8, at para. [29] A preliminary inquiry is a statutory process conducted by a statutory court that can only exercise the power it is given. There......
1 books & journal articles
-
Judges on Judging in Canadian Appellate Courts: The Role of Legal and Extra-Legal Factors on Decision-Making.
...from newspaper accounts and our conversations with the judges, we believe we have a diversity of ideologies included in the sample. (38) 2020 NSCA 8 (39) Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, s 286.1(1). (40) Rouse, supra note 38 at para 35. (41) See "Annual Report: Court of Appeal for British C......