R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 28
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Bryson |
| Citation | 2020 NSCA 28 |
| Docket Number | CAC 480811 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Date | 19 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. J.T.,
...to which it will result in prejudice to the respondent (Lane v. Carsen Group, 2003 NSCA 42; R. v. DeYoung, 2017 NSCA 13). In R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 28, Justice Bryson held a proposed amendment that “is not plainly unsustainable or fails to present an arguable issue” should be ......
-
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc,
...to which it will result in prejudice to the respondent (Lane v. Carsen Group, 2003 NSCA 42; R. v. DeYoung, 2017 NSCA 13). In R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 28, Justice Bryson held a proposed amendment that “is not plainly unsustainable or fails to present an arguable issue” should be ......
2 cases
-
R. v. J.T.,
...to which it will result in prejudice to the respondent (Lane v. Carsen Group, 2003 NSCA 42; R. v. DeYoung, 2017 NSCA 13). In R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 28, Justice Bryson held a proposed amendment that “is not plainly unsustainable or fails to present an arguable issue” should be ......
-
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc,
...to which it will result in prejudice to the respondent (Lane v. Carsen Group, 2003 NSCA 42; R. v. DeYoung, 2017 NSCA 13). In R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 28, Justice Bryson held a proposed amendment that “is not plainly unsustainable or fails to present an arguable issue” should be ......