R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Madam Justice Griffin,The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt-Van Oosten
Citation2019 BCCA 323
Docket NumberCA46040
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Date11 September 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Heickert, 2020 NSPC 9
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 24 janvier 2020
    ...will be attributed to some considerations or factors than the others. [84]         In R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323, [2019] B.C.J.No. 1738, at paras. 17-19, the British Columbia Court of Appeal held that the phrase “exceptional circumstances”......
  • R. v. Stampp,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 8 décembre 2022
    ...cases in which such sentences had been imposed on offenders guilty of trafficking methamphetamine, heroin and fentanyl: R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323; R. v. Joon, 2017 BCPC 301; R. v. McClain, 2018 BCPC 369; R. v. Dewat, 2019 BCPC 183; and R. v. Schneider, 2019 BCCA [9]    &......
  • R. v. Trifunski,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 1 janvier 2022
    ...but such a sentence will rarely be imposed. [20]        Finally, the Crown relied on R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323. Mr. Ruiz was the owner and driver of the vehicle used to transport the drugs in the present case to the clearing in the forest. The trial c......
  • R. v. Graham,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 13 juillet 2022
    ...his circumstances were exceptional turned largely on his youth and status as a first offender. Citing R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323 at paras. 17–19 [Ruiz], the judge recognized that there is no litmus test for exceptional circumstances and that his duty......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. Heickert, 2020 NSPC 9
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 24 janvier 2020
    ...will be attributed to some considerations or factors than the others. [84]         In R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323, [2019] B.C.J.No. 1738, at paras. 17-19, the British Columbia Court of Appeal held that the phrase “exceptional circumstances”......
  • R. v. Stampp,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 8 décembre 2022
    ...cases in which such sentences had been imposed on offenders guilty of trafficking methamphetamine, heroin and fentanyl: R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323; R. v. Joon, 2017 BCPC 301; R. v. McClain, 2018 BCPC 369; R. v. Dewat, 2019 BCPC 183; and R. v. Schneider, 2019 BCCA [9]    &......
  • R. v. Trifunski,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 1 janvier 2022
    ...but such a sentence will rarely be imposed. [20]        Finally, the Crown relied on R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323. Mr. Ruiz was the owner and driver of the vehicle used to transport the drugs in the present case to the clearing in the forest. The trial c......
  • R. v. Graham,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 13 juillet 2022
    ...his circumstances were exceptional turned largely on his youth and status as a first offender. Citing R. v. Ruiz, 2019 BCCA 323 at paras. 17–19 [Ruiz], the judge recognized that there is no litmus test for exceptional circumstances and that his duty......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT