R. v. S.A.,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | SCHRECK J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 3622 |
| Date | 10 June 2020 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CR-20-00000193-00BR |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
R. v. N.Y., 2021 ONSC 1398
...measures designed to protect everyone in the community: Kazman, at para. 18; R. v. Hoo-Hing, 2020 ONSC 6343, at para. 40; R. v. S.A., 2020 ONSC 3622, at para. 41; R. v. H.K., 2020 ONSC 3275, at para. 97; R. v. D.M., 2020 ONSC 3152, at para. 35; R. v. F.D., 2020 ONSC 3054, at para. 18; Forbe......
-
R. v. Dahis, 2021 ONCA 483
...must be substantial, in other words, significantly likely”: R. v. Manasseri, 2017 ONCA [226], at para. 87. In R. v. S.A., 2020 ONSC 3622, Schreck J. stated at [para.] The secondary ground requires the Court to conduct a risk assessment. Put another way, it requires the Court to predi......
-
R. v. McQuinn, 2021 ONSC 1443
...settings, has benefits for the community as a whole: Kazman, at para. 18; R. v. Hoo-Hing, 2020 ONSC 6343, at para. 40; R. v. S.A., 2020 ONSC 3622, at para. 41; R. v. H.K., 2020 ONSC 3275, at para. 97; R. v. D.M., 2020 ONSC 3152, at para. [20] Anothe......
-
R. v. Mbuyamba, 2020 ONSC 4434
...everyone, including reducing the prison population to the extent possible to prevent the spread of the virus.”: R. v. S.A., 2020 ONSC 3622, at para. 41. [56] No evidence was put forward to indicate that the accused was at heightened ris......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
R. v. N.Y.,
...measures designed to protect everyone in the community: Kazman, at para. 18; R. v. Hoo-Hing, 2020 ONSC 6343, at para. 40; R. v. S.A., 2020 ONSC 3622, at para. 41; R. v. H.K., 2020 ONSC 3275, at para. 97; R. v. D.M., 2020 ONSC 3152, at para. 35; R. v. F.D., 2020 ONSC 3054, at para. 18; Forbe......
-
R. v. Dahis,
...must be substantial, in other words, significantly likely”: R. v. Manasseri, 2017 ONCA [226], at para. 87. In R. v. S.A., 2020 ONSC 3622, Schreck J. stated at [para.] The secondary ground requires the Court to conduct a risk assessment. Put another way, it requires the Court to predi......
-
R. v. McQuinn, 2021 ONSC 1443
...settings, has benefits for the community as a whole: Kazman, at para. 18; R. v. Hoo-Hing, 2020 ONSC 6343, at para. 40; R. v. S.A., 2020 ONSC 3622, at para. 41; R. v. H.K., 2020 ONSC 3275, at para. 97; R. v. D.M., 2020 ONSC 3152, at para. [20] Anothe......
-
R. v. Mbuyamba,
...everyone, including reducing the prison population to the extent possible to prevent the spread of the virus.”: R. v. S.A., 2020 ONSC 3622, at para. 41. [56] No evidence was put forward to indicate that the accused was at heightened ris......
Get Started for Free