R v. S.C.D.Y., 2020 ABCA 134
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling,The Honourable Madam Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 134 |
| Docket Number | 1901-0070-A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 07 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
R v RV, 2020 ABPC 138
...Litchfield 1993 4 SCR 333; R. v. Lifchus 1997 118 C.C.C. 3d 1 SCC; R. v. Starr, 2000 S.C.J. No. 40; R v Lutoslawski 2010 SCC 49 R v SCDY 2020 ABCA 134; R v Ryon 2019 ABCA 36; R v Achuil 2019 ABCA 299; R v Sawatsky 2017 ABCA 179; R v Vuradin 2013 SCC 38; R v Vuradin 2011 ABCA 280; R v Morris......
-
R v Cormier,
...para 10. 7 However, as stated by the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Sawatsky, 2017 ABCA 179, at para 21 (and as reconfirmed in R v SCDY, 2020 ABCA 134 at para 80 (footnote 82)): The “rule in Browne v Dunn” is not absolute. The trial judge is best suited to determine whether a ......
-
R v McKnight,
...Emphasis was also placed on what has been described as the Crown prosecutor’s “quasi-judicial role” (R v SCDY, 2020 ABCA 134 at para 81), which requires that he or she must always be “scrupulously fair” (R v Desjardin, 2019 ABCA 215 at para 11). The duty u......
-
Russell v. R.,
...raised concerning, at the very least, the extent of the rule’s applicability to the defence in criminal proceedings. In R. v. S.C.D.Y., 2020 ABCA 134, [2020] A.J. No. 393 (QL), the Court questioned, admittedly in obiter, whether the rule applies with the same strictness to the accused as it......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
R v RV, 2020 ABPC 138
...Litchfield 1993 4 SCR 333; R. v. Lifchus 1997 118 C.C.C. 3d 1 SCC; R. v. Starr, 2000 S.C.J. No. 40; R v Lutoslawski 2010 SCC 49 R v SCDY 2020 ABCA 134; R v Ryon 2019 ABCA 36; R v Achuil 2019 ABCA 299; R v Sawatsky 2017 ABCA 179; R v Vuradin 2013 SCC 38; R v Vuradin 2011 ABCA 280; R v Morris......
-
R v McKnight,
...Emphasis was also placed on what has been described as the Crown prosecutor’s “quasi-judicial role” (R v SCDY, 2020 ABCA 134 at para 81), which requires that he or she must always be “scrupulously fair” (R v Desjardin, 2019 ABCA 215 at para 11). The duty u......
-
R v Cormier,
...para 10. 7 However, as stated by the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Sawatsky, 2017 ABCA 179, at para 21 (and as reconfirmed in R v SCDY, 2020 ABCA 134 at para 80 (footnote 82)): The “rule in Browne v Dunn” is not absolute. The trial judge is best suited to determine whether a ......
-
Russell v. R.,
...raised concerning, at the very least, the extent of the rule’s applicability to the defence in criminal proceedings. In R. v. S.C.D.Y., 2020 ABCA 134, [2020] A.J. No. 393 (QL), the Court questioned, admittedly in obiter, whether the rule applies with the same strictness to the accused as it......
Request a trial to view additional results