R. v. S.R.T., 2014 ABPC 266
| Judge | Fradsham, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | 2014 ABPC 266,[2014] A.R. Uned. 737,[2014] A.R. Uned. 737 (PC) |
| Date | 21 November 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Hammermeister (R.), 2015 ABPC 228
...and imposed 3 years concurrent for each of the sexual offences, one year consecutive for the internet luring. [40] In R. v. S.R.T. , 2014 ABPC 266, the offender pled guilty to an offence under s. 271 arising from a 2 year sexual relationship which began when he was 20 years old and the comp......
-
R. v. Ambrus (B.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. JL.138
...the application in this case of the starting point regime used in major sexual assaults. I remain of the view I expressed in R. v. S.R.T. 2014 ABPC 266 at paragraphs 25-55. There are too many possible variations in the circumstances of the offence, and insufficient evidence to justify a pre......
-
R. v. D.B., 2016 ABPC 23
...wouldn't have to testify. A guilty plea that saves a victim from testifying is well recognized as a mitigating factor. In R. v. S.R.T. , 2014 ABPC 266, [2014] A.J. No. 1323, the Court found at that a guilty plea that saved a teenage victim of sexual assault from testifying was "evidenc......
3 cases
-
R. v. Hammermeister (R.), 2015 ABPC 228
...and imposed 3 years concurrent for each of the sexual offences, one year consecutive for the internet luring. [40] In R. v. S.R.T. , 2014 ABPC 266, the offender pled guilty to an offence under s. 271 arising from a 2 year sexual relationship which began when he was 20 years old and the comp......
-
R. v. Ambrus (B.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. JL.138
...the application in this case of the starting point regime used in major sexual assaults. I remain of the view I expressed in R. v. S.R.T. 2014 ABPC 266 at paragraphs 25-55. There are too many possible variations in the circumstances of the offence, and insufficient evidence to justify a pre......
-
R. v. D.B., 2016 ABPC 23
...wouldn't have to testify. A guilty plea that saves a victim from testifying is well recognized as a mitigating factor. In R. v. S.R.T. , 2014 ABPC 266, [2014] A.J. No. 1323, the Court found at that a guilty plea that saved a teenage victim of sexual assault from testifying was "evidenc......