R. v. Sabattis, 2020 ONCJ 242
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Justice Marcella Henschel |
| Citation | 2020 ONCJ 242 |
| Date | 08 May 2020 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Docket Number | York Region – 18 07637 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
R. v. Penunsi, 2020 NLSC 101
...Taypotet, 2015 SCC 30; R. v. Turpin, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1296; R. v. Daybutch, 2015 ONCJ 302; R. v. Daybutch, 2017 ONSC 6678; R. v. Sabbatis, 2020 ONCJ 242. STATUTES CONSIDERED: Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1985, R.S.C. 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.......
-
R. v. Ankur,
...discharge constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Every case is to the contrary (see: R. v. Luke, 2021 ONSC 3550; R. v. Sabattis, 2020 ONCJ 242); including ones where the conviction would trigger immigration consequences (see: R. v. Tebay, supra; R. v. Cummings, [73] ......
-
R. v. Cheema,
...disproportionate” sentence that amounted to cruel and unusual punishment for a drinking and driving offence: R. v. Sabattis, 2020 ONCJ 242 (Henschel Alana Sabattis, a young Aboriginal first offender, was found guilty of impaired driving and blood alcohol driving offences. She challen......
-
R. v. Ankur,
...referenced a number of cases where other mandatory minimums had been challenged, including R. v. Luke, 2019 ONCJ 514 and R. v. Sabattis, 2020 ONCJ 242 (both aboriginal first offenders) and R. v. Tebay, 2020 NSPC 43 (a case involving a permanent resident in Canada, where a discharge was not ......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
R. v. Penunsi, 2020 NLSC 101
...Taypotet, 2015 SCC 30; R. v. Turpin, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1296; R. v. Daybutch, 2015 ONCJ 302; R. v. Daybutch, 2017 ONSC 6678; R. v. Sabbatis, 2020 ONCJ 242. STATUTES CONSIDERED: Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1985, R.S.C. 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.......
-
R. v. Ankur,
...discharge constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Every case is to the contrary (see: R. v. Luke, 2021 ONSC 3550; R. v. Sabattis, 2020 ONCJ 242); including ones where the conviction would trigger immigration consequences (see: R. v. Tebay, supra; R. v. Cummings, [73] ......
-
R. v. Cheema,
...disproportionate” sentence that amounted to cruel and unusual punishment for a drinking and driving offence: R. v. Sabattis, 2020 ONCJ 242 (Henschel Alana Sabattis, a young Aboriginal first offender, was found guilty of impaired driving and blood alcohol driving offences. She challen......
-
R. v. Ankur,
...referenced a number of cases where other mandatory minimums had been challenged, including R. v. Luke, 2019 ONCJ 514 and R. v. Sabattis, 2020 ONCJ 242 (both aboriginal first offenders) and R. v. Tebay, 2020 NSPC 43 (a case involving a permanent resident in Canada, where a discharge was not ......
Request a trial to view additional results