R. v. Sand, 2019 SKQB 18
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Danyliuk |
| Citation | 2019 SKQB 18 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 18 January 2019 |
| Docket Number | CRM 317 of 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. GAMBLE, 2019 SKQB 327
...has the jurisdiction to make the order sought by the defence. This is set out in detail in R v Peepeetch, 2019 SKQB 132, and R v Sand, 2019 SKQB 18. While other authorities exist which suggest this jurisdiction is lacking, the commentary in most of those authorities is oblique or tangential......
-
PEEPEETCH v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, 2019 SKQB 132
...such an order lies in the court’s inherent jurisdiction. In that regard, he relies on the decision of Justice Danyliuk in R v Sand, 2019 SKQB 18 [Sand]. FACTUAL BACKGROUND [3] ......
2 cases
-
R. v. GAMBLE, 2019 SKQB 327
...has the jurisdiction to make the order sought by the defence. This is set out in detail in R v Peepeetch, 2019 SKQB 132, and R v Sand, 2019 SKQB 18. While other authorities exist which suggest this jurisdiction is lacking, the commentary in most of those authorities is oblique or tangential......
-
PEEPEETCH v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, 2019 SKQB 132
...such an order lies in the court’s inherent jurisdiction. In that regard, he relies on the decision of Justice Danyliuk in R v Sand, 2019 SKQB 18 [Sand]. FACTUAL BACKGROUND [3] ......